User talk:Scubadiver99

Welcome!

Hello, Scubadiver99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Barry m (talk) 07:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boxer Wachler links and references[edit]

I removed your addition of Boxer Wachler references on Keratoconus since they made the section unreadable, and appeared to be verging on advertising. I understand that Boxer Wachler is associated with keratoconus treatment, but several of the linked articles already reference him. If there's a need for the CCL section to be expanded, perhaps you can propose something on the talk page. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You left a comment on my User page, not my Talk page - my response is the same as above. If you keep adding the Boxer Wachler-related links, people may think that you have WP:COI and that you are simply spamming links. I suggest you discuss the changes on various articles' Talk pages so that people understand your reasons for adding these links. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at Talk:Keratoconus#Corneal_Collagen_Crosslinking_with_Riboflavin_Section_and_Boxer_Wachler. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Hi. Please refrain from constantly undoing others edits to pages like you have been on LASIK and Keratoconus. Instead, as you were already suggested to do, visit the articles talk page and discuss changes. Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Jehochman ^Talk 04:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C3-R[edit]

I have left you a question on the KC talk page; perhaps you could respond. Thanks. — BillC ^talk 06:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverts on Keratoconus[edit]

Please stop reverting - if you disagree with the consensus on the talk page, you have other options, for example WP:3O. I understand that the personal attacks and comments by the IP editor who signs themselves "RH" must be irritating, but please try to look at the discussion as a whole. If necessary, I will ask for the talk page to be protected again. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Assistance with disruptive editors at Talk:Keratoconus. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information needed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scubadiver99[edit]

Hello. Thank you for filing Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scubadiver99. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a code letter, which indicates to checkusers why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely, SPCUClerkbot (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Help with continued disruption on article talk page[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]