User talk:Scottydaking123

Welcome![edit]

Hi Scottydaking123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Muhandes (talk) 07:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to YNW Melly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at YNW Melly, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 02:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at YNW Melly discography. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 07:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lil Tecca have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lil Tecca was changed by Scottydaking123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950218 on 2022-05-17T21:27:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mixtapes are generally considered types of albums on Wikipedia[edit]

Hi. Please stop removing mixtapes as a subheading of albums on discographies. They are generally considered types of albums on Wikipedia (hence mixtape album), unlike EPs, which are generally shorter than full album length and were a defined format before mixtapes. Thanks. Ss112 00:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Lil Baby - My Turn (Deluxe).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lil Baby - My Turn (Deluxe).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:4NEM album cover.webp[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:4NEM album cover.webp. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 04:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 4NEM (Chief Keef album)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 4NEM (Chief Keef album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Grabup (talk) 04:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4NEM (Chief Keef album) moved to draftspace; add sources, add references, and kindly add categories[edit]

An article you recently created, 4NEM (Chief Keef album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whiteguru (talk) 04:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm AshMusique. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cars 3 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AshMusique (talk) 10:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Inside Out 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Inside Out 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not add releases without articles to templates[edit]

Hello. Regarding this edit to Template:Yeat, please see WP:EXISTING. Templates are not discographies, they are for linking to existing articles. Thanks. Ss112 07:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:4NEM (Chief Keef album)[edit]

Hello, Scottydaking123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:4NEM (Chief Keef album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:4NEM (Chief Keef album)[edit]

Hello, Scottydaking123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "4NEM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Kevin Harlan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

4th and 31 moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to 4th and 31. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:4th and 31 has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:4th and 31. Thanks! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 01:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th and 31 (December 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Potentially notable, however, the sources - though varied - largely don't refer to the play itself, rather than game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4th and 31 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 07:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scottydaking123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 07:46, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th and 31 (December 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4th and 31 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 19:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to 2023 NBA In-Season Tournament, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ^{Dieter Lloyd Wexler} 06:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scottydaking123! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of LeBron James several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:LeBron James, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Basketball Association § In-season tournament in inbox.—Bagumba (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the edit summary?[edit]

You were asked to start a consensus by another editor regarding these additions. Now you just sit there and go on reverting? I'll stay here all night. The smart thing to do is follow the instructions that were given to you by @SportsGuy789 Bringingthewood (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the in season tournament is a highlight why does it keep getting deleted Scottydaking123 (talk) 02:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because with some highlights you need a consensus to add it to the infobox. That's why SportsGuy789 reverted them in the first place. It's easier to go where they said to go and state what you want to do. Honestly, if you continue to revert these and the wrong person sees it, you could get blocked. We do the same thing with the NFL pages, sometimes you just need others to know what your intent is. Please try it out. Bringingthewood (talk) 02:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now you're just wasting your time. I tried with you. Just remember something, I can stay awake for 24 hours, what you're doing now is all going to be reverted in the long run -- without a consensus. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cuh yu is wasting yo time being ah Wikipedia editor yu needa go get anotha job labro i only edit it bc lebron won the in season tournament with the lakers nd also why would tht need A consensus cuh Scottydaking123 (talk) 03:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I expected as much. Good luck in the future. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also Imagine Being Ah Steelers Fan. My Kansas city Chiefs own yall cuh ftyb Scottydaking123 (talk) 03:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also how Yu frm da Bronx but you a steelers fan. Yu is a bandwagon too cuh yu Supposed to be Either a Giants or jets Fan Scottydaking123 (talk) 03:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Kansas City Chiefs season[edit]

I do want to comment on the above conversation first, please try to keep discussions on topic. Wikipedia is not a forum to discuss personal opinions on topics, including criticizing an editor for living in an area with a team and being a fan of another team.

Regarding your edit linking 2023–24 NFL playoffs in 2023 Kansas City Chiefs season a total of 3 times in the Infobox, per WP:LINKONCE, a page should only be linked once in an article. Now, you can link that page in the infobox and link it in the lede and maybe in the playoffs section, but in the infobox it should only be linked once.--Rockchalk7 17 15:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:4th and 31[edit]

Hello, Scottydaking123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:4th and 31, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]