User talk:Scotsman18

Scotsman18, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Scotsman18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Natashia Lewis[edit]

Thanks for patrolling new pages, but WP:CSD#A11 was not the right tag for that page - it is for a new word or new religion, not a person. If you have strong evidence that the person does not exist, or the claims were ludicrous (captain of Manchester United at age 13, flies to the moon every day, that kind of thing) then {{db-hoax}} would do; but for unsourced but not impossible claims like this, the right tag would be {{subst:Prod blp}} which gives the author a week to produce some source.

What I have done with this one is userfy it to User:Reader2016/Natashia Lewis and point the author to [[WP:BLP] and WP:V.

Check out WP:NPP. There is also good advice at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. If you are in doubt whether or how to tag something, you can always leave it and see what someone else does - that's a good way to learn. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YUDMIK - Draft page: GOBI Corporation[edit]

Hi, Scotsman18! I am not sure how this chat works. Anyways, I first created the page about a major Mongolian company in the cashmere industry, which is mentioned in another Wikipedia article on Mongolian economy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Mongolia) - Gobi Corporation (Gobi Cashmere). Since I am a first time contributor to Wikipedia, I was advised to add more links from public sources, which apparently I did. And then in a couple of minutes I received a "Speedy Deletion Note" on this article. The article is devoted to a particular organisation, a major company both in the world cashmere production and in the Mongolian economy. There are other examples of such articles: a major textiles producer Hermes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermès) and a major Mining Company in Mongolia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolia_Energy_Corporation). How is the article in question considered promotion? Please advise, what should I do to change your opinion and how we could proceed with drafting the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudmik (talk • contribs) 12:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Yudmik (talk) 12:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to New Plymouth— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Gladamas^talk 23:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scotsman18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am i sock of an account. Because i haven't abused multiple accounts i've only used one since i first joined Wikipedia. I'm looking afford to do more editing. Scotsman18 (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We have evidence this is not accurate. Yamla (talk) 13:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.