User talk:Scarpy/Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old AfD - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cognitive_Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe

last version before the redirect[edit]


cognitive-theoretic[edit]

Predatory[edit]

Grumpy and friends[edit]

Written by Langan[edit]

  • The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe[2]
  • An introduction to mathematical metaphysics[3]
  • Introduction to Quantum Metamechanics (QMM)[4]
  • The Reality Self-Simulation Principle[5]
  • The Metaformal System[6]
  • The Metareligion as the human singularity[7]
  • Cheating The Millennium: The Mountain Explanatory Debts of Scientific Naturalism[8]
  • Introduction to Quantum Metamechanics (QMM)[9]
  • The Art of Knowing: Expositions on Free Will and Selected Essays[10]
  • The Resolution of Newcomb's Paradox[11]
  • Introduction to the CTMU[12]

Don't care[edit]

Very weak RS rational[edit]

  • [20] Argues that while CTMU is unfalsifiable it’s can be confirmed other ways.

Gibberish[edit]

  • [21] There is a remark here citing Langan regarding conspansion. Otherwise this seems largely unintelligible.

not really related[edit]

Old news[edit]

Old references[edit]

Possibly useful for BLP article[edit]

  • https://opentextbc.ca/introsociology2eopenstax/chapter/why-socialization-matters/
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • https://superscholar.org/interviews/christopher-michael-langan/
  • "Pseudo-science and parascience are thus terms for raising the scientific status of modern esoteric teachings. The term parascience, which marks a spatial relationship to the sciences, is more often used in apologetic contexts, whereas the term pseudoscience is used in ›debunking‹ (exposing) approaches. Under the term pseudoscience rather characterological properties and persuasion strategies are described, while the concept of para-science aims to point to historical parallel developments and an epistemically equivalent status. The CTMU just mentioned, with its connections to computer and cybernetic knowledge, is a relevant example, which at the same time embodies a connecting line to the next chapter, which is devoted to the spiritual interpretation of technology."[45]
  • "the cognitive-theoretic model of the universe (CTMU), a highly teleological attempt at a unified theory of physical reality. The CTMU is the brainchild of Christopher Michael Langan, an independent scholar who...has no academic affiliation... The CTMU postulates that creation occurs gradually through the universe self-replicating features of itself within itself."[46]
  • "Langan is an outsider scientist who draws attention to himself primarily through his self-staging..."[45]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Meijer, Dirk K. F. (2018). "Processes of Science and Art Modeled as a Holoflux of Information Using Toroidal Geometry". Open Journal of Philosophy. 08 (4): 365–400. doi:10.4236/ojpp.2018.84026.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  2. ^ "The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe:A New Kind of Reality Theory". Progress in Complexity, Information and Design. September 2002. ISSN 1555-5089. Archived from the original on 2002-11-05.
  3. ^ Langan, Chris (2017). "An introduction to mathematical metaphysics". Cosmos and History. 13 (2). ISSN 1832-9101.
  4. ^ "Introduction to Quantum Metamechanics (QMM)". Cosmos and History. 15 (2). 2019. ISSN 1832-9101.
  5. ^ Langan, Christopher (2020). "The Reality Self-Simulation Principle: Reality is a Self-Simulation". Cosmos and History. 16 (1). ISSN 1832-9101.
  6. ^ Langan, Christopher (2018). "The Metaformal System: Completing the Theory of Language". Cosmos and History. 14 (2). ISSN 1832-9101.
  7. ^ Langan, Christopher (2018). "Metareligion as the Human Singularity". Cosmos and History. 14 (1). ISSN 1832-9101.
  8. ^ Christopher Langan (13 May 2014). "13. Cheating The Millennium: The Mountain Explanatory Debts of Scientific Naturalism". In William Dembski (ed.). Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing. Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ORD). pp. 6–. ISBN 978-1-4976-4895-1.
  9. ^ Christopher M. Langan (13 June 2019). Introduction to Quantum Metamechanics (QMM). Mega Foundation Press. ISBN 978-0-9719162-1-0.
  10. ^ Christopher Michael Langan (2002). The Art of Knowing: Expositions on Free Will and Selected Essays. Mega Press. ISBN 978-0-9719162-0-3.
  11. ^ Langan, Christopher (1989). "The Resolution of Newcomb's Paradox". Noesis (44). Mega Society.
  12. ^ Langan, Christopher (1998). "Introduction to the CTMU" (PDF). Ubiquity. 1 (1).
  13. ^ Jeroen B. J. van Dijk (October 1, 2007). "Objects of Thought, Thoughts of Objects ? From object-orientation to Process Physics". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. ^ Mize, Jonathan (March 1, 2020). "Semantics and Semiotics of the Explanation of Reality: A Brief Look into Some Semantic Properties of Langan's CTMU". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. ^ Jonathan Mize (3 January 2020). God versus Language: Contrasting Metaphysical Methods of Wittgenstein's Tractatus and Langan's CTMU. Lulu.com. pp. 278–. ISBN 978-0-359-71664-7.
  16. ^ Antonin Tuynman (9 September 2016). Technovedanta. Lulu.com. ISBN 978-1-326-78477-5.
  17. ^ Norman, Richard Lawrence. "The Ontology of Christopher Langan's Psychical Physics: The Neuropsychology of the Atemporal Recursive Processes–an empirical framework" (PDF). The Journal of Unconscious Psychology and Self-Psychoanalysis.
  18. ^ Smith, Stephen (2019). "A Possible Holarchy Representing Morphic Resonance as One Side of the Poised Realm". Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research. 10 (5). ISSN 2153-8212.
  19. ^ Nakayama, Michimasa (2020). Ontology, Music, Praxis (PDF). Mount-Inn Record.
  20. ^ Michelle Kathryn McGee (2016). "Notes from the Existential Underground: The Universe as a Complex Emergent System". Cosmos and History. 12 (2). ISSN 1832-9101.
  21. ^ Suhendro, Indranu (April 1, 2012). "The Surjective Monad Theory of Reality: A Qualified Generalization of Reflexive Monism". In Rabounski, Dmitri; Smarandache, Florentin; Borissova, Larissa (eds.). Progress in Physics, vol. 2/2012: The Journal on Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Experimental Physics, including Related Themes from Mathematics. Infinite Study. pp. 30–46. GGKEY:QYU8K8B8FK1. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |lay-url= ignored (help)
  22. ^ Indranu Suhendro (2011). Florentin Smarandache (ed.). Proceedings of the Introduction to Neutrosophic Physics: Unmatter & Unparticle - International Conference. Infinite Study. pp. 29–. ISBN 978-1-59973-182-7.
  23. ^ Ursyn, Anna (2016). "Integrative Visual Projects for Cognitive Learning". Knowledge Visualization and Visual Literacy in Science Education. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design. pp. 330–373. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0480-1.ch012. ISBN 9781522504801.
  24. ^ Chu-Carroll, Mark (2011-12-01). "The Annoying CTMU Thread". Good Math/Bad Math.
  25. ^ Smith, Stephen. "Pitch Inverted Songs as Affirmation of Panpsychism Based on a Theoretical Mirror Universe". Scientific God Journal. 11 (3). ISSN 2153-831X.
  26. ^ Slattery, Diana Reed (August 2010). Communicating The Unspeakable: Linguistic Phenomena in The Psychedelic Sphere (Phd thesis). University of Plymouth. OCLC 768068848.
  27. ^ Neppe, Vernon M; Close, Edward R (2016). "A Nutshell Key Perspective on the Neppe-Close "Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm" (TDVP)" (PDF). IQ Nexus Journal. 8 (3): 7–79.
  28. ^ McRoberts, Michael (2012-05-22). "The Operational Calculus: It's not Art". Langan writes about the historical duality of Cartesian mind/matter and considers the universe in a "state transition" of cognitive perception. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. ^ Mize, Jonathan J. (22 May 2020). "A Novel Semantics for Belief, Knowledge and Psychological Alethic Modality". arXiv:2005.10947. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  30. ^ McManus, Matthew (2016). "Becoming to Belong: On the Relation between Infinite Consciousness and the Absolute". The European Legacy. 21 (1): 52–70. doi:10.1080/10848770.2015.1097032. ISSN 1084-8770. S2CID 148264240.
  31. ^ Norman, Richard Lawrence (2015). "Quantum Unconscious Pre-Space: A Psychoanalytic/Neuroscientific Analysis of the Cognitive Science of Elio Conte–The Hard Problem of Consciousness, New Approaches and Directions". NeuroQuantology. 13 (4). doi:10.14704/nq.2015.13.4.869. ISSN 1303-5150.
  32. ^ Maula, Mast (April 2013). A Myopic View of the Universe and its Evolution (PDF) (PhD thesis). New Delhi: Jamia Millia Islamia.
  33. ^ a b Sager, Mike (November 1, 1999). "The Smartest Man in America". Esquire. Archived from the original on February 24, 2020. Retrieved 2020-02-25. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; February 25, 2020 suggested (help) Cite error: The named reference "Sager" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  34. ^ Brabham, Dennis (August 20, 2001). "The Smart Guy". Newsday. Retrieved February 24, 2020.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  35. ^ "BBC One - Make Me..., Make Me Smart". bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2015-09-02.
  36. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPZe5HWlr8s [unreliable source?]
  37. ^ McFadden, Cynthia (December 9, 1999). "The Smart Guy". 20/20. Archived from the original on August 17, 2000. Retrieved February 24, 2020.
  38. ^ Morris, Errol. (August 14, 2001). "The Smartest Man in the World". First Person.
  39. ^ "World of knowledge: we harness the expertise of the brawny, the brainy, and the bearded to solve your most pressing dilemmas". Archived from the original on 2009-03-08.
  40. ^ O'Connell, Jeff (May 2001). "Mister Universe". Muscle & Fitness. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2019-10-09.
  41. ^ Wigmore, Barry (2000-02-07). "Einstein's brain, King Kong's body". The Times.
  42. ^ Malcolm Gladwell (18 November 2008). Outliers: The Story of Success. Little, Brown. pp. 9–. ISBN 978-0-316-04034-1.
  43. ^ Rod Plotnik; Haig Kouyoumdjian (27 January 2012). Discovery Series: Introduction to Psychology. Cengage Learning. pp. 782–. ISBN 978-1-111-34702-4.
  44. ^ Quain, John R. (November 2001). "Wise Guy". Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation: 64–67. ISSN 0161-7370.
  45. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Menzler2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  46. ^ Cite error: The named reference Redvaldsen2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

discussion with Chris[edit]

Menzler translation sentence by sentence[edit]

Translation from CTMU content in this source. This exists here as a writing aid for other articles and I believe is fair use.[1]

CTMU Holistic reinterpretations of relativity, quantum and other modern scientific theories are found in paraphysics and esotericism.

CTMU Holistische Umdeutungen von Relativitäts-, Quanten- und anderen modernen naturwissenschaftlichen Theorien finden sich in Paraphysik und Esoterik.

These include the »geometrodynamics« of John Wheeler.

Zu nennen sind unter anderem die »Geometrodynamik« von John Wheeler.

a reformulation of the general theory of relativity, or the so-called »Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe« (CTMU) of a certain Christopher Langan.

einer Umformulierung der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie oder das sogennante »Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe« (CTMU) eines gewissen Christopher Langan.

This theory of a contemporary classical paraphysicist shows how paraphysics ties in with more recent developments in institutional science.

An dieser Theorie eines zeitgenössischen Paraphysikers lässt sich zeigen, wie die Paraphysik an neuere Entwicklungen der institutionellen Wissenschaft anschließt.

Langan is an outsider scientist who draws attention to himself primarily through his self-staging. (On his biography and self-stylization see chapter 6 of this paper).

Langan ist ein Außenseiter-Wissenschaftler, der vor allem durch seine Selbstinszenierung auf sich aufmerksam macht. (Zu seiner Biographie und Selbststilisierung siehe Kapitel dieser Arbeit.)

In several writings, mainly in a 56-page paper161, Langan presents the CTMU, which is supposed to be a Theory of Everything, i.e. a comprehensive explanation of the origin and functioning of the universe, something that physicists like Stephen Hawking long for in public books.

In mehreren Schriften, maßgeblich ineinem -seitigen Paper legt Langan die CTMU vor, die eine Theory of Everything darstellen soll, also eine umfassende Erklärung für das Entstehen und das Funktionieren des Universums, also etwas, das Physiker wie Stephen Hawking in Publikumsbüchern herbeisehnen.

Langan claims to be able to read large aporias of science, such as the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, the resolution of the contradiction between chance and determinism, the question of the irreversibility of time, the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.

Langan gibt vor, große Aporien der Wissenschaft lösen zu können, wie die Unvereinbarkeit von Quantenmechanik und Relativitätstheorie, die Auflösung des Widerspruchs zwischen Zufall und Determinismus, die Frage der Unumkehrbarkeit der Zeit, die Beschleunigung der Ausdehnung des Universums.

He wants to put an end to mind-matter dualism (as has been tried or done many times in the history of science) and, what particularly concerns him, he wants to formulate a critique of Darwin's theory of evolution based on chance or contingency, which he wants to put on a physical-cosmological basis.

Er will den Geist-Materie-Dualismus beenden (wie in der Wis-senschaftsgeschichte bereits vielfach versucht oder getan) und, was ihn besonders umtreibt, er will eine Kritik der auf Zufall oder Kontingenz bauenden Darwinschen Evolutionstheorie formulieren, die er auf eine physikalisch-kosmologische Grundlage stellen möchte.

His complex representation has essentially the goal of defining the universe as a self-perceiving and processing system that writes its own rules for further development and processing and finally produces its own interpretation.

Seine komplexe Darstellung hat im Wesentlichen das Ziel, das Universum als sich selbst perzipierendes und prozessierendes System zu bestimmen, das seine eigenen Regeln zu Weiterentwicklung und Prozessierung schreibt und schließlich seine eigene Deutung hervorbringt.

The model of the universe, according to Langan, must be a model of perception.

Das Modell des Universums, so Langan, müsse ein Modell der Perzeption sein.

The preservation of the Perception is information, which is therefore the subject of Langan's theory, and which must be modelled in such a way that it contains the possibility of self-reflection and self-expression.

Die Währung der Perzeption sei Information, die demzufolge Gegenstand von Langans Theorie ist, und die so modelliert werden müsse, dass sie die Möglichkeit der Selbstreflexion und Selbsthervorbringung enthalte.

The CTMU defines the universe or reality as »Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language«162, a reflexive language characterized not only by self-referencing and recursive self-definition, but also by complete self-configuration and self-execution (»reflexive read-write functionality«163 expressed in IT terms).

Die CTMU definiert das Universum oder die Realität als »Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language«, eine reflexive Sprache, die nicht nur durch Selbstreferenz und rekursive Selbstdefinition charakterisiert ist, sondern durch die vollständige Selbstkonfiguration und Selbst-Ausführung (»reflexive read-write functionality« in IT-Begriffen ausgedrückt).

Information should be a union of matter and spirit, and the idea of self-regulation should guarantee that there is no determinism.

Information soll dabei eine Vereinigung von Materie und Geist sein, und die Vorstellung der Selbst-Regelgebung soll garantieren, dass es keinen Determinismus gebe.

For determinism, according to Langan, is always foreign determinism from outside the system; the self-determinism advocated by Langan, on the other hand, regulates the supposed easiness in quantum mechanics and evolution.

Denn Determinismus sei immer, so Langan, Fremd-Determinismus von außerhalb des Systems; der von Langan vertretene Selbstdeterminismus regele dagegen die vermeintliche Zufälligkeit in Quantenmechanik und Evolution.

True chance is rejected by Langan as »magic«.

Echter Zufall wird von Langan als »Magie« abgelehnt.

The self-genesis of the universe is to serve as a foil for the biological theory of evolution.

Die Selbsthervorbringung des Universums soll als Folie für die biologische Evolutionstheorie dienen.

Insofar as the universe writes its own framework conditions, Langan can reformulate the concept of Intelligent Design.

Insofern also das Universum sich seine eigenen Rahmenbedingungen schreibt, könne Langan das Konzept des Intelligent Design neu formulieren.

Intelligent Design, i.e. the assumption that an intelligent creator initiated the creation of the universe in 164 and supervised and controlled the further development and also the biological evolution.

Intelligent Design, also die Annahme, dass ein intelligenter Schöpfer die Entstehung des Universums in Gang gesetzt hat und die Weiterentwicklung und auch die biologische Evolution betreut und steuert.

This intelligent creation could be explained as being the universe itself.

Dieses intelligente Schöpfung könne so erklärt werden, dass sie das Universum selbst sei.

Langan's general concept is no different from common modern theories such as cybernetics and systems theory, and the idea of a world that recognizes itself over time is even reminiscent of Hegel's unfolding of the world spirit.

Das generelle Konzept Langans unterscheidet sich nicht von gängigen modernen Theorien wie Kybernetik und Systemtheorie, und die Vorstellung der sich im Laufe der Zeit selbst erkennenden Welt gemahnt gar an Hegels Entfaltung des Weltgeistes.

He explicitly refers to the aforementioned John Wheeler, the originator of geometrodynamics.

Explizit bezieht er sich auf den eben erwähnten John Wheeler, den Urheber der Geometrodynamik.

It also seems revealing that such a current paraphysical theory is based on the relatively new concept of unfolded information.

Auch erscheint es aufschlussreich, dass eine so aktuelle paraphysikalische Theorie sich am relativ jungen Informations-Begriff entfaltet.

Hello, came here from the redirection discussion where you'd quoted this translation. No, that should be more like "It also seems revealing that such a current paraphysical theory revolves [lit.: "unfolds itself"] around the relatively new concept of information." That is, "entfaltet" refers back to "itself", i.e. "the theory", not the immediately preceding "concept of information". Not, I suppose, that it matters; the discussion is over. (Hope you didn't pay much more than a fiver for that translation...) --CRConrad (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The main difference between recognized theories and the CTMU is the lack of academic acceptance, on the one hand, and full-bodied announcements and comprehensive claims on the other.

Der Unterschied zwischen anerkannten Theorien und der CTMU besteht einerseits in der mangelnden akademischen Akzeptanz, andererseits in den vollmundigen Ankündigungen und im umfassenden Anspruch.

The focus on the topic of Intelligent Design is set in the context that Langan appears as a critic of Darwin and has at least placed an essay in a Christian American creationist anthology.

Die Kaprizierung auf das Thema des Intelligent Design steht in dem Kontext, dass Langan als Darwin-Kritiker auftritt und zumindest einen Aufsatz in einem christlichen amerikanischen Kreationisten-Sammelband platziert hat.

His theory makes the God unavailable to physics obsolete.

Dabei macht seine Theorie ja den der Physik unverfügbaren Gott obsolet.

But Langan revives it in so far as theology and spirituality are the results of the self-design of the universe.

Langan lässt ihn aber insofern aufleben, als Theologie und Spiritualität Ergebnisse des Selbst-Designs des Universums seien.

Pseudo-science and parascience are thus terms for raising the scientific status of modern esoteric teachings.

Pseudowissenschaft und Parawissenschaft sind also Begriffe, um den wissenschaftlichen Status moderner esoterischer Lehren zu erheben.

The term parascience, which marks a spatial relationship to the sciences, is more often used in apologetic contexts, whereas the term pseudoscience is used in ›debunking‹ (exposing) approaches.

Der Terminus Parawissenschaft, der eine räumliches Verhältnis zu den Wissenschaften markiert, wird dabei häufiger in apologetischen Zusammenhängen verwendet, der Begriff Pseudowissenschaft dagegen in ›debunkenden‹ (entlarvenden) Ansätzen.

Under the term pseudoscience rather characterological properties and persuasion strategies are described, while the concept of para-science aims to point to historical parallel developments and an epistemically equivalent status.

Unter dem Pseudowissenschaftsbegriff werden eher charakterologische Eigenschaften und Überzeungungsstrategien beschrieben, während der Parawissenschaftsbegriff auf historische Parallelentwicklungen und einen epistemisch gleichwertigen Status hinweisen will.

The CTMU just mentioned, with its connections to computer and cybernetic knowledge, is a relevant example, which at the same time embodies a connecting line to the next chapter, which is devoted to the spiritual interpretation of technology.

Die eben erwähnte CTMU stellt mit ihren Anschlüssen an informatisches und kybernetisches Wissen ein einschlägiges Beispiel dar, das zugleich eine Verbindungslinie zum nächsten Kapitel verkörpert, welches sich der spirituellen Deutung von Technologie zuwendet.

  1. ^ Menzler, Nils (25 July 2019). "Chapter 2: Theoretische Vorarbeiten § 2.2 »Paraphysik«, »Parawissenschaft« und »Pseudowissenschaft«". Techno-Esoterik in der säkularisierten Moderne: Überzeugungsstrategien, Apparate und die Formung des modernen Subjekts (in German). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 41–43. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27303-3. ISBN 978-3-658-27302-6.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scarpy/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_the_Universe&oldid=972348257"