User talk:Sasaki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Sasaki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Timrem 22:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:PW & WP:MOS. - Chadbryant 22:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR is more relevant, perhaps you should read that? Sasaki 22:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR does not apply to vandalism, be it intentional or an innocent mistake by an inexperienced editor. - Chadbryant 23:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you are pretty inexperienced. Apology accepted, but we'll see what the adminstrators say Sasaki 23:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They say your comment is deliberately provocative, a personal attack and this is a warning not to repeat it. Tyrenius 00:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"They"? Perhaps you should address the attitude of Mr Bryant as well? Sasaki 00:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Figure of speech. I am well aware of Chadbyrant. I have not accused you of sockpuppetry. In fact I have rejected such a suggestion on Chadbryant's talk page. I am merely providing information about the general background of Chadbryant so that any investigating admin can be on the watch for multiple editors acting in collusion, and make a judgement as to their indepedence. Tyrenius 00:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noted thanks. I wouldn't particularly class "Not proved sockpuppetry at the moment" as rejecting such a suggestion personally, your comment does seem rather ambiguous to be fair. Sasaki 00:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I apologise that it casts an aspersion. I've unfortunately had to get into the habit of constantly blocking sockpuppets attacking Chadbryant. I suggest that you make sure nothing you do could be construed as harassing or attacking him. It's a dangerous game. Tyrenius 02:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent enquiry is answered on my talk page. Tyrenius 18:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

I suggest you stop trolling, Sasaki, and harassing Chadbryant, which is what you're doing by putting on my talk page the fact that he chose to link to a dollar sign. This is a warning. Tyrenius 15:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

brutal truth[edit]

I usually put all albums and EPs and all, except singles in the <band> albums category. I guess mosts ppl do that. AFAIK there is no <band> EPs category. Spearhead 15:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

entombed[edit]

He is credited as air guitarist on DCLXVI and as such is (was?) also referenced on the official entombed site. AFAIK he never played a single not on the album per se . Spearhead 17:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

can't find it on their website (but I can't seem to get much at entombed.org anyway... maybe my flash is outdated, but it doesnt compain); google doesn't find much info. Anyway... maybe it's best to split the list up to include separate session/guest member section. Estby and Karki were only one-time guests too. As you say he is creditted as guitarist he probably should be as such in the member list, and credited as Air guitar / guest solo on "tear it loose" on the album credits page. Spearhead 17:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it a bit.... go have a look Spearhead 19:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andre[edit]

I myself would be willing to believe that Andre achived close to 7 feet....however, I am not the only person involved here, and you might want to put forward your proposal on the talk page, there are a lot of ppl interested in Andre's height;o)(Halbared 11:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

DVDVR[edit]

Should we file a 3RR violation against the IP address? (as well as sockpuppet to get around indef block?) SirFozzie 17:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the Talk page for Death Valley Driver Video Review Thanks! SirFozzie 18:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you can almost admire him for his stuborness.. Note the ALMOST. SirFozzie 15:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think he's getting frustrated, I just wish he would leave the article alone.. see the talk page.. SirFozzie 18:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena and Top 500[edit]

I saw that you write that Cena wins the top 500 in 2006, but the top 500 in 2006 is not for now, we don't have the results, so Cena can't win it. I remove it.

Oh my god, the worst news of the year, Cena n°1...

fansites=[edit]

if you say that about the fansites then why are you only removing the randy orton one, your doing it to spite me you never editted the randy page before, the fansite has been there from the start of this page and you never removed it till i editted kurts page with true information that you cant except, until you go and remove fansites from the other wrestlers pages then i will add it back in it isnt one rule for the randy page and another for the rest like your doing. Lil crazy thing 11:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC) i will not tell you cos if you actually use your head you will know, theres no rule saying they cant be added at all, there has never been a problem before till you and only one other started, Lil crazy thing 12:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i dont need to read it because at least one fansite IS allowed, as i said before until you go and add this stupid rule you want to all the toher wrestlers pages then im not accept you singling out randy ortons page just to spite me. So i suggest you go to all the wrestlers bios and movies bio and popstars bios and apply this, but of course you wont because i dont edit those pages. Lil crazy thing 12:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

stop being sarcastic towards me, it's not smart its pathetic, as i said before i dont need to tell you cos if you use your damn head for once all you have to do is go to any wrestlers bios, but you refuse to do that. you are doing this to the randy orton page to spite me which you actually havent denied. [1] go to this link and read number 4 and 5 that backs up the sites. Lil crazy thing 12:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wow one or two other pages, i have added the link of proof above that backs up the fansite so it can be added, ask an admin to join in i dont care, i stand by what i've said and i've even provided proof so it can be added. Lil crazy thing 12:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rey mysterios myspace link[edit]

please stop removing it;having the link stops the posers from adding there rey mysterios myspace to the site.thanks!lol. 13:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DVDVR Semi-Protected, asking for help with the article[edit]

You were one of the folks who helped to work on the Death Valley Driver Video Review... now that the edit war is over (a helpful admin semi protected it to stop JB from anonymously vandalizing it), would you mind reviewing the article and seeing if it could use anything (especially citations, the admin asked me to improve the article on that point, and I have attempted to do so).. and see what consensus we can get? Thanks! (sorry, forgot to sign) SirFozzie 04:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Bryant[edit]

If he is violating it you need to report him ASAP. Don't wait, just do it. TruthCrusader 14:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hunk[edit]

YOU'VE BEEN HIT BY THE


BEAUTIFUL truck

ONCE YOU'VE BEEN HIT, YOU HAVE TO HIT 8 Beautiful People IF YOU GET HIT AGAIN YOU'LL KNOW YOU'RE REALLY BEAUTIFUL! IF YOU BRAKE THE CHAIN, YOU'LL BE CURSED WITH UGLYNESS FOR 10 YEARS SO PASS IT HIT WHO EVER YOU THINK IS BEAUTIFUL!152.163.100.74 02:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]