User talk:Saru786

Suggested WikiProjects[edit]

If editing articles on video games interests you, consider joining the Video games WikiProject and/or one or more of these platform specific projects: WikiProject Xbox, WikiProject PlayStation and/or the Nintendo task force. Cheers, Miguel AG (talk) 07:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Providing Sources[edit]

Just an FYI, you cannot add in information about something that is supposedly going to happen in the future without providing a source to confirm this. For example, saying that certain actors will be providing voices for upcoming video games needs to have an outside news source to confirm this statement. If you need help with including sources in your posts, please don't hesitate to ask or see how other users have done this. Thanks.Bobbyandbeans (talk) 19:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I have now added the source for each voice actor that confirms they are voice acting their respected characters. Thank you for pointing this out for me, I will be more alert about this in the future. Saru786 (talk) 00:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal thoughts?[edit]

Hey, seeing how you have been wokring hard on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 lately, how excited are you for the game? How do you think it is going to compare to Battlefield 3? —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 22:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, I can go into huge details and very tiny details as to which game I think is better. I've been in numerous debates (and arguments) about this very topic. But tbh, all I'm gonna say is, plain and simple, in my opinion, Battlefield 3 is the clear winner on PC, while Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is the clear winner on console. And I'm a console gamer, so I'm leaning more towards MW3. But I do have BF3 pre-ordered on console, but I'm not looking forward to it as much as MW3. I'm so excited for MW3, I can't even explain my excitement. I love videogames in general and will edit long and hard to get as many videogames articles free of mistakes as I can. Saru786 (talk) 01:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you here. The newer COD games are just better on the console. I think it's just more fast-paced than BF. But then again BF3 looks like it will have better graphics and some different styles of gameplay. Either could be better. I personally prefer MW3. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 09:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MW3's Engine[edit]

The Engine is unofficially the MW3 engine and is actually a modified version of the IW 4.0 engine. You need to look at the differences between engines. Look at the differences between iD Tech 4 and iD Tech 5. Look at the differences between the Creation Engine and the Gamebryo. --Schmeater (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking more about the name. It doesn't matter what the difference between IW 4.0 and IW 5.0 is. It is called MW3 Engine a.k.a. IW 5.0 by the developers and should be put in the article as so. Please don't change it again. Saru786 (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MW3 page[edit]

You should not undo those changes. No offense intended but it only looks better for you. You still need more reading experience. Let us guys with proper English change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red romanov (talk • contribs) 04:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your kidding me, right? That is not proper English. Read what you wrote. Carefully. Also, there is no reason for it to be in marketing and release. Black Ops had the Japanese release in the start of the article aswell and it was stated exactly as it is in this article. Please don't change it again after I do. I don't want an editing conflict to occur. Both your reasons for changing it are invalid. Until you have a vaild reason to change it, leave it be. Thank you. Saru786 (talk) 04:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons are valid. I could explain:

-Leading section should summarize the most important points of the article. Special releases should be in the Release section, obvious as it says. Also, there are also versions with other dubbed languages like spanish or french. They are not important enough to be in the leading section with that length, even if you think Japanese is special. I see there is an example, but it could be inappropriate example which no one gives any attention to it.

-We need more official words instead of "subbed" and "dubbed". It's easy for you gamers to understand but what about people in other specialty? Articles should be written in formal tone, remaining clear and understandable. I could tell "will handle", "subbed" and "dubbed" are not in formal tone.

-While you were removing my edits, you removed the reference too don't you? You have to provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.

I will not do anything more about this. Let's just leave it to better contributers.

I am not a frequent writer, and I see you are really willing to help contributing to Wikipedia, so I recommend reading this article Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles. See help pages for more. I hope those will help you become a better writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red romanov (talk • contribs) 05:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the problem I have with that. Your English wasn't correct either. If you seriously went back and saw what you wrote, you would understand what I'm talking about. I'm already a great writer, and just to let you know, the Japanese release section, I didn't write. That was someone else, I just fixed a couple of things in it. "Subbed" and "Dubbed" are actual English words, believe it or not. I even found them on various dictionary sites. I know you mean no offense, but please don't tell others to learn proper English when you, yourself, don't know it. Also, the Japanese release SHOULD be there because it comes out on different days than the Spanish, French, German, etc. ones. On top of that, it's being distributed by a whole other distributor, which belongs in the main section of the article. It's not a special release of any sort. It's just a DIFFERENT release from the others. It's the same game but with just tweaks to fit the style of the country it is in. That doesn't classify as a special release. A special release would be, for example, the Hardened Edition, which belongs in the "Retail Versions" section of the article. Thank you. Saru786 (talk) 12:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VGChartz[edit]

Hello, Saru786. I would like to remind you not to add sales figures from VGChartz website, like you did to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. It's not a reliable source to begin with - read this on why it is. Thanks -- Hounder4 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for informing me of this. Saru786 (talk) 12:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Assassin's Creed: Revelations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to DLC

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your work on countless articles, including Modern Warfare 3. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Happy editing! -- Luke (Talk) 23:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! I will continue to keep contributing to as many gaming articles as I can. :) Saru786 (talk) 20:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Warfare 3[edit]

Why did you remove my text explaining trolling Battlefield 3 fans? Jamcad01 (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because, that isn't constructive. You have no proof of any sort what type of people those are that write those reviews. Personally, I agree with you, but it's not my call. This is an encyclopedia, and should be treated as such. Bias views don't work here. Thank you. Saru786 (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the source I put. It explains in the article. Jamcad01 (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I hate to break it to you, but just because you put an article as an ref, doesn't automatically make your statement true. The article itself needs some type of proof of some sort, which it doesn't provide. It only voices an opinion. Unless, you can somehow prove what the article is stating, is true, I recommend you leave it how it is. Thank you. Saru786 (talk) 08:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Soap Mactavish MW2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Soap Mactavish MW2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Call-of-duty-elite-logo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Call-of-duty-elite-logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages
- Main project – talk
- Project category – talk
- Portal – talk
VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
- Reference library – talk
- Newsletter – talk
- Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

April 2015[edit]

Your addition to Exo (band) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Random86 (talk) 07:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Big Bang (South Korean band) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Saru786. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Saru786. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Saru786. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soap Mactavish MW2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soap Mactavish MW2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]