User talk:Sarah jason

This is Sarah jason's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Whispering was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Whispering^(t) 15:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sarah jason! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 15:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sarah jason/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Sarah jason/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering^(t) 15:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Navia Lx[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Navia Lx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Navia Lx[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Navia Lx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Navia Lx[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Navia Lx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 15:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Navia Lx[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Navia Lx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 18:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarah jason (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believed I used multiple accounts and I violated the policy I was young and stupid that day. for past few years I've been learning and Wikipedia polices. Now I understand and this will never happen again... please I request my account to be unblock Sarah jason (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Highly likely block evasion as Lucifer122, an account abusive enough to get blocked on its own behalf. Yamla (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarah jason (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello administrators! I violated Wikipedia roles and am not here to request for unblock. I am here to request for ban if possible. I created these accounts @Sultana Anya:, @Cnntv12: @Lux Thomas: and @Micheal FD1: three years ago. Every time I got block I create a new account, I was stupid. I know nothing about Wikipedia that year. My actions cost harm to many people who are living in my location (country) sharing my IP address one of them is @Rabbe Quiz:, I created these accounts without even reading what so call policies.

So am begging Wikipedia Community and Administrators if possible to ban all the accounts. I will not use Wikipedia anymore because my ma'am die my life change I got married and am even pregnant. I have a family to take care of.

My brother @Rabbe Quiz: call calls me on 24/11/2022 he told me he got blocked because of my past actions on English Wikipedia. I felt sad bacause Wikipedia helps him since our mother die 20 days ago. Administrators @Girth Summit:, @Yamla:, @331dot:, @Bbb23: I requested all the accounts I created past three years ago to be ban completely and please give to @Rabbe Quiz: a chance he is going through a lot and he did nothing wrong on English Wikipedia and give to everyone else that got block because of my actions a chance. To Administrators of English Wikipedia I'm deeply sorry for my actions. Sarah jason (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technical data makes it seem more likely that you and Rabbe Quiz are the same person. This also doesn't address your most recent sock, Victor Ohids (talk · contribs). --Blablubbs (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I strongly oppose lifting the block from the Confirmed sockpuppet account, Rabbe Quiz. Nor would it be appropriate to lift the block here, and no point in converting it to a ban. --Yamla (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: What is the use of Wikipedia if not giving it volunteers another one chance, especially those who did nothing wrong but got block because of someone else's action? I know administrators don't trust the IP adress from this location. That was why I strongly suggested my accounts to be banned or deactivate and give to other volunteers that did nothing wrong another chance.

It's the ludicruous "did nothing wrong" bit that keeps you blocked. --Yamla (talk) 09:38, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: I do not know who @Victor Ohids: is. I only created these accounts @Lux Thomas: , @Micheal FD1: , Sultana Anya. Technical data makes it seem more likely that me and Rabbe Quiz are the same person because we are living in the same compound sharing the same WI-FI right now.

@Yamla: What I did in the past was preposterous. You have every rights to oppose my requests. I was a fool; I was stupid; I admit it and am begging you and the other administrators plus the Wikipedia community please not for me but for everyone that got block because of my foolishness. Give them another chance please, and deactivate or ban my accounts. Sarah jason (talk) 14:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarah jason (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Technical data makes it seem more likely that me and Rabbe Quiz are the same person because we shared the same IP address and very closer relationship. These users @Fame Shine: , @Victor Ohids: , @Giir West: , @Giirwest5: , @LilMeekTheCreator: , @Los Van don: all are confirmed my sockpuppets but I don't know them, there are not my accounts. I swear to you administrators on my mom's grave. I request my account to be unblock so I will deactivate it or I request administrators to convert my block to ban if possible, so that other Volunteers who are living in my location country not to get block because of my past foolishness actions. We are all human being we make mistakes and we learn from them. I have learned a lot from my mistakes, I have learned that what goes around comes around. all am requesting not for me but for the future volunteers, I request this account to be unblock and deactivated and am deeply sorry for what I did. Sarah jason (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarah jason (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, and I will not continue to cause damage or disruption and I will make useful contributions instead in my free time. Sarah jason (talk) 07:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Repeating platitudes back to us will not help you get unblocked. 331dot (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.