User talk:Sapphie Jewelpet

TouhouFan9801, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi TouhouFan9801! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Digimon articles[edit]

Hi, in regards to your recent edits on Digimon Adventure, Digimon Adventure 02, and Digimon Fusion, please refrain from adding information without a reliable source. Please check the discussion at Talk:Digimon Fusion#Hasbro instead of continuously adding uncited information. lullabying (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check what I found online to prove that Digimon is part of the entertainment assets of Saban Brands which were transferred to Hasbro. I found them online. Do you believe me now? PascalMuganyizi (talk) 14:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC) https://www.comicbookmovie.com/sci-fi/power_rangers/hasbro-set-to-acquire-the-power-rangers-franchise-more-from-saban-entertainment-for-522-million-a160174https://geektyrant.com/news/hasbro-buys-power-rangers-franchise-from-saban-entertainment https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1407-tokusatsu/76660588 http://www.toonbarn.com/other-cartoons/saban-brands-prepares-shutdown/[reply]

RPM[edit]

I don't understand. But is the 17th season of Power Rangers is a drama? Because the music looks like it's a drama and it looks like they're acting like it's a professional drama tv show. I know it's for a kids, but is it actually a kids drama? PascalMuganyizi (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of television programs based on Hasbro properties has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 06:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Swearing/Personal Attacks or Harrassment[edit]

Can you stop swearing at others? I know it’s stressful but you need to take your anger in yourself, not outside it. Luigitehplumber (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glitter Force: By Hasbro[edit]

I'm looking at the same inventory, SJ, and I'm sorry, I see where it says, "Glitter Force never had any merchandise or toys of any kind, thus is not a toy line. Stop insisting on having it included in lists of Hasbro toys." But it might be a toy line for future purposes. Because I do see that the trademark was changed by Toei Animation. They transferred the franchise to Hasbro, I see. But that is all. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: http://tokusatsunetwork.com/2017/05/saban-brands-gives-glitter-force-trademark-toei-animation/

https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2018-06-21/glitter-force-brand-rights-move-to-hasbro/.133174

https://twitter.com/sakuraimomokas/status/1009431204045705216

https://glitterforce.hasbro.com/en-us

https://web.archive.org/web/20180706215057/http://www.glitterforce.com/Home/Policy

@PascalMuganyizi: Hasbro got Glitter Force in a package deal that they mainly bought for Power Rangers, and that's it. It's unlikely they have intent on actually doing anything with Glitter Force, especially since the press release about acquiring Saban Brands did not mention it. Stop making spurious edits in regards to Saban/Hasbro, the other guy who did that is now permanently blocked and you may be too if you keep this up. --Sapphie Jewelpet (talk) 22:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hasbro Entertainment Brands[edit]

Should it be okay to add "Entertainment Brands or International Entertainment Brands"? PascalMuganyizi (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]