User talk:SOCRAMSILVA

February 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Water heating have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

This includes the edits made while you were editing as 189.2.106.210 109.153.20.122 (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SOCRAMSILVA. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SOCRAMSILVA. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SOCRAMSILVA|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not receiving any payment for this, only wait for a good information because we have knouledge about this, but if is important for you the information be are be, ok no changes. We can caontribute with good information in another topic, my own topic, wiki is free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SOCRAMSILVA (talk • contribs)

That directly contradicts what you just said on my talk page. MrOllie (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, only for right information, end!

No.

You stated that you work for the company that made this shower head ("... I work for the company that made this product ..."). That means you have a clear Conflict of interest which you must properly disclose on your user page using the {{tl|Paid}} template. It is a breach of Wikipedia's terms and conditions to fail make such a disclosure and your account can be blocked if you make any further edits without doing so.
Since you have a COI, you are not permitted to directly edit the article. You may only propose changes on the article talk page using the {{edit request}} template supported by the obligatory WP:SECONDARY sources (i.e. not your own marketing bumpf). Another editor will then determine if your proposal is acceptable and adequately sourced.
Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and is not in the business of offering any opinion as to whether a product is safe; dangerous; dangerously installed or just badly installed. That is down to opinion (see WP:POV and WP:NPOV). For all we know, the shower may be installed in accordance with a badly translated set of installation instructions. Having said that, I certainly would not want to shower under it.

-109.153.20.122 (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]