User talk:S5A-0043

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by .

Strange page denial Draft:Hapi-Line_Fukui[edit]

Why was this page denied. I was just about to start creating the page when I discovered that the page already existed in draft form. Can you please re-consider it? Ergzay (talk) 04:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ergzay: When I reviewed the draft at that time, there were only 3 sources. The third one was a secondary source and I took that into account for notability, but the first two are primary sources which cannot count into WP:GNG. I believe another person has added more secondary sources such that notability is demonstrated, and I would be more likely to accept it in its current state. However since I reviewed this draft already I think it's better to let another reviewer take a look. S5A-0043^Talk 05:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I'm not familiar with draft review (I have the ability to publish pages myself so have never gone through the process), what's the process to get it restarted? Or is it already in queue? Ergzay (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else has submitted it for review already, so yes it's already in the queue. You can continue to improve it, expand it, add more sources etc in the meantime, but if you're satisfied with the current draft then there's nothing you need to do. S5A-0043^Talk 05:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. I've already made a few edits to update it to current. Ergzay (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well because the review took too long someone bypassed it and created the page directly and now the page history is lost. This review process really seems to be broken. Ergzay (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's a frustrating thing for us reviewers too. S5A-0043^Talk 09:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ke Mu San (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ke Mu San and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S5A-0043! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shadow311 (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]