User talk:Russlowe

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Russlowe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]

Hello! Russlowe, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boone Speed draft[edit]

Hello! I've taken another look at your Boone Speed draft. I have not "reviewed" it officially, as I generally prefer to have a different editor, who may have a disparate perspective, provide a secondary review. I do have a few comments I hope you find helpful. The first sentence says he is an "influential figure" within rock climbing. How so? That statement isn't really fleshed out or specified, either in the section or in the article in general. As such it appears to promote the subject, instead of providing encyclopedic information. The third paragraph has got to go. It is blatantly promotional. Instead of saying "his work is great" which is supported by an interview with Boone, say "(noted art critic) states his work has a quality of global connectivity....." The first is self-promotion. The second is serious analysis. I can't comment on the notability of many of the publications you cite, hopefully an editor with expertise on rock climbing culture will review the draft next. If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia's reliable source policy. The section "Creative Career" is completely un-sourced. Please find some independent, reliable sources to support these assertions. All the best, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I appreciate this feedback, and clarification. I will work on the edits you mention, and understand why they're important to get right. I'll resubmit once the citations and edits are complete. Thanks! Russlowe (talk) 21:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please take a look and re-review this page now. I took your feedback into account, cited additional sources, and removed a few things that might have been viewed as self-promotional / speculative. Thanks for the assistance! Russlowe (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Boone Speed has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boone Speed. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time in reviewing my article. I don't understand how the references cited could be perceived as 'referencing his own work' as you mention. They're all independent publications cataloging his career in a number of different ways, none of them are self-promoting or self-generated. There is no question whether Boone Speed is 'notable' based on Wiki standards, the only question is whether I'm able to figure out how to publish an article with accurate / appropriate citations, which I feel I have done. Thanks for your help. --Russlowe (talk) 21:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boone Speed has been accepted[edit]

Boone Speed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andi Kovel (January 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andi Kovel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andi Kovel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Amkgp 💬 11:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andi Kovel (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability is established by significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources; something that the current referencing isn't able to establish.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andi Kovel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andi Kovel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andi Kovel has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andi Kovel. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andi Kovel has been accepted[edit]

Andi Kovel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 00:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]