User talk:Rural Legend~enwiki

Edit Warring Warning

Hi Rural Legend, blah, blah, blah, blah blah. You must not say anything that may be critical of our sweethearts.

Jessica King

Could you find a more solid reference for that? I got a 404 message. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Angus King. Without debating the issue, I will say that the term "amnesty" is too much of a POV issue(there are those who do not consider it amnesty). If you want to post Sen. King's vote or position on an issue like that, it needs to be done as neutrally as possible. An opinion piece in a newspaper is not a valid source for doing that. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rural Legend. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rural Legend~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm Cwobeel. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Maggie Hassan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Cwobeel (talk) 23:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Please stop edit warring on the Luby's shooting page. If you believe your particular link/material should be included, please take it to the talk page to discuss it with other editors. 67.149.186.215 (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 17:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jonathunder (talk) 13:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

December 2018

See WP:FRINGE. Wikipedia is "biased" against conspiracy theories and their advocates. We do not create artificial balance for incorrect ideas.

There are discretionary sanctions in place regarding alternative medicine as well as pseudoscience, both of which his health views fall under. Some of his other beliefs also fall well within the US politics sanctions you've already been notified about above. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Also this was not a minor edit. Do not mark an edit as minor unless it's something like a spelling or grammar correction. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at G. Edward Griffin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Formal warning, next revert goes to WP:EWN Ravensfire (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guy (Help!) 00:48, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paradise Hill, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milton Township (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

POV vandalism at Doug Mastriano

You've been here long enough to know better than to make POV vandalistic, whitewashing, edits. Keep your political views out of your editing. Read about that at WP:NPOV. Because you're acting like an ignorant newbie, you're going to get a template. Never pull that shit again or you'll be in big trouble. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Where do you come off making those accusations? You are using your purely political POV to attack and revise valid edits. You should be in big trouble for your baseless and over the top allegations. Yes, I have been here a long time and know the rules. Diatribes like yours give Wiki a bad name. You should be ashamed of yourself for dragging your politics into this. Rural Legend~enwiki (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doug Mastriano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank for your personal opinion, but it was not an "unconstructive" edit. Your reversion was vandalism. Rural Legend~enwiki (talk) 20:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)