User talk:Rupert the Frog

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rupert the Frog! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 17:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Race (biology)[edit]

If you think something is wrong about the text, please raise a discussion about it on the talk page. You can change text cited to a source already to say something different from what the source says. You'll need to provide evidence that the source is wrong, e.g. better, newer sources that disprove the old source. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 22:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does the source say? Does anybody know? Rupert the Frog (talk) 12:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning concerning your edit at Talk:Race (human classification)[edit]

Ok, I see that your statement meant to read "to protect people such as ..." from Marxist activists. But that's not what it actually said. In any case our talk pages are not WP:FORUMS and that sentence wasn't relevant to improving the article. Please stick to discussing the article. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 10:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This applies on talk pages also[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 10:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another area where you are editing that has discretionary sanctions[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 11:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This means admins can impose sanctions on editors? Isn't this the case with every website? How is all of this useful? Rupert the Frog (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On other websites it's probably more random. Here we have a system for selection of Administrators and organised methods for creating specific sanctions for problem areas. These particular sanctions were created by the WP:Arbitration Committee which is popularly elected and deals with conduct (not content) disputes that the community itself hasn't been able to resolve. This works pretty well in keeping down WP:Edit warring and other conduct problems. Doug Weller talk 14:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So all of this is to tell me Wikipedia has better sanctions? Rupert the Frog (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought you really wanted to know about discretionary sanctions. I seem to have wasted my time. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you might have. Not to worry. Rupert the Frog (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Doug Weller talk 15:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]