User talk:Rsparkles
May 2024[edit]
Hello, I'm Myrealnamm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cameron Stewart have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- References to tabloids violate Wikipedia’s rules on defamation Rsparkles (talk) 20:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Which one? Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rsparkles! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Cameron Stewart several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Cameron Stewart, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Also, "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word.. Sariel Xilo (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cameron Stewart. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The article already said the accusers, everything given was already assumed to be alleged and the changes were unnecessary. Wiiformii (talk) 21:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Cameron Stewart shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sariel Xilo (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)