User talk:Rossbawse

Welcome to Wikipedia

Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

• Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
• Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers — A good starting point.
• The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
• Quick Introductions to:

• Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
• Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
• Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
• Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
• Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?

• What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the many help pages.

• Google: Wikipedia is very well indexed by Google. Searching for a term, even about an editing question, followed by "wiki" or "wikipedia" usually pulls up what you need.

Where next?

• Check out Help:Watching pages. Your own Watchlist can become your favorite place to visit.
• If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
• If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
• If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
• For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page or the Wikipedia:Teahouse page could be your next stop!

See also

• Help:Starting editing

Good luck and happy editing.```Buster Seven Talk 23:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

German train axe attack

Your edit to the article relies too heavily on one soruce only, and one which is not held in general regard to be very factually correct as a tabloid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egroeg5 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Mississippi

Hello, I'm Revmqo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mississippi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Revmqo (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, I'm Jackson Peebles. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Howard Stern Show staff because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jackson Peebles (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rick Ross. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. STATic message me! 04:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pearcy murders

added a link pointing to Pearcy

Shootout

added a link pointing to AQAP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles C. Johnson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French and Spanish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Darren Goforth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben Garrison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Garrison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Garrison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brustopher (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Israeli Secret Intelligence Service listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. Since you had some involvement with the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Israeli Secret Intelligence Service, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phoenix freeway shootings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glendale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I-70 Killer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wichita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dawson murder case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firebomb. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Beersheva bus station shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beersheva bus station shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beersheva bus station shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Rklawton. I noticed that you made a change to an article, November 2015 Paris attacks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rklawton (talk) 00:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents linked to ISIL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rossbawse

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. 107.10.236.42 (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... (your reason here) --Rossbawse (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC) not an attack page, but an article I was working on a while ago. Legitimate sources were provided backing up what I wrote.

I suggest moving it to your sandbox if you plan to continue working on it. Rklawton (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2015 Colorado Springs shooting, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 00:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewish Museum of Belgium shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algerian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

2015 Spanish Embassy Attack in Kabul

Hi. Thank you for correcting the title of my article. I appreciates your help. Many thanks. Khalid Nezami (talk) 18:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matsumoto incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gassing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2015 Las Vegas car attack

The article 2015 Las Vegas car attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hardly notable enough for a stand-alone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 20:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Las Vegas car attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Las Vegas car attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Las Vegas car attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 08:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents linked to ISIL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint-Denis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Tel Aviv shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Tel Aviv shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Tel Aviv shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CatcherStorm ^talk 18:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 al-Qamishli bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Do you mind helping a fella' save his sanity?

Well, I don't know if some of the editors noticed, but with the least arrogance, I updated most of the list of terrorist incidents since Setpbember 2015 and you may imagine what is it to be constipated with terror attacks and giving the fact editors including me have documented more then 50 terror attacks in 22 days (that's more then two per day), I kinda start to get sick of it. So I thought to my self, since you seem to have added some incidents, I should give you some of the tools I use to find terror attacks.

• This website, is an indicator. It is not a source, but you can use it to find attacks and then search them in mainstream media.

• This is kind of a dubious website, but it is also a good indicator, never use it a source, extremly biased.

• This website is good for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, it has information about Naxalite-Maoist insurgency in India and Taliban conflict in Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as Blochistan.

• I also find Yahoo News a very good source since it collects reports from several news agencies altogather.

• For Israel news, well, if you want, from time to time, to see if I am doing a terrible job, you can use this website as an incidcator or a source (I never used it as a source anyways) for Israel.

I really hope to see more editors working on the list since I am starting to loose it really.. Thanks anyway.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 20:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Valdresekspressen hijacking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2016 Dalori attack

added a link pointing to Firebomb

List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016

added a link pointing to Al-Shabaab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Richard Spencer

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Rockypedia (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Kalamazoo shootings

I want to thank you, and by extension the other editors working on it, for creating a fair, balanced and most importantly, calm and non-sensational article on the above. As a former long time Kalamazoo resident, I'm too emotional about this to involve myself directly. The young lady in the side story about the couple that cancelled their ride is my ex-fiancee's daughter. Some of the other editors on the article will tell you that I am strongly opposed to articles on current crime stories here. There are several reasons, but the main two are:

1. Sadly, mass casulty incidents have become so frequent that they have ceased to have historic impact except to those involved, or at least to those in the locale they occur.
2. Inevitably they become a quagmire of rumors and POV.

Good editing practice has avoided the second here, thank you. And as far as historic impact, well I'm sure Uber's bottom line will see some impact for at least a couple quarters. John from Idegon (talk) 05:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hesston

Pls see Talk:2016_Hesston_shooting

81.108.18.234 (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of terrorist incidents, 1997

added links pointing to Palestine and Havanna

List of terrorist incidents, 1980

added a link pointing to Sapin

List of terrorist incidents, 1999

added a link pointing to Admiral Duncan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of terrorist incidents, 1985

added a link pointing to Mahendranagar

List of terrorist incidents, 1986

added a link pointing to Arar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Left (Germany) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm NicatronTg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gawker has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 23:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (2016 Bamako attack) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2016 Bamako attack, Rossbawse!

Wikipedia editor Winterysteppe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good so far. need a bit more sources

To reply, leave a comment on Winterysteppe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

About repeatedly reverting ISIL-related articles

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as 2016 Brussels bombings, which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

LjL (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

ITN for 2016 Lahore suicide bombing

--Spencer^T♦C 07:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 1988, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israel-Palestine conflict. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Austrian presidential election, 2016

Hello,

would you please add a source for your numbers? There is a field in the table. Thank you, --Vogone (talk) 03:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 Donald Trump Chicago rally protest

Can you clean up the quoting issue? I want the article promoted to DYK. --George Ho (talk) 22:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Join the discussion on Talk, or do not edit the article.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alternative for Germany ‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 17:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

that murder suicide

I do think that a shooting getting this much coverage should be redirected/merged somewhere, can you return to that AFD and take a look at my proposal? More efficient to keep the discussion there. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For excellent, hard and steady work at the sadly endless task of writing responsible articles about major terrorist attacks and mass homicides. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Aktobe shootings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Euro 2016 riots

Hello Rossbawse,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Euro 2016 riots for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, 2016 Marseille riots.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 02:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Orlando massacre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Orlando massacre. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. General Ization ^Talk 21:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Use of triple parentheses

Please don't tag names with triple parentheses like you did in this edit. — Strongjam (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

And also this edit. Perhaps you have some software you need to disable? — Strongjam (talk) 16:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Euro 2016 stuff

There seem to be quite a few new articles on the recent violence in Euro 2016 that's been all over the news. I've merged them altogether into a single content fork Violence at UEFA Euro 2016, which is linked directly off the main UEFA Euro 2016 article with a brief summary, and plugged it as an In The News Candidate, so hopefully people will be guided in the direction of a single article and work together on it. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Shooting of Alton Sterling page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 16:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 shooting of Baton Rouge police officers, you may be blocked from editing. Obama was clearly not the perpetrator EvergreenFir (talk) 16:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2016 shooting of Baton Rouge police officers. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This edit is unacceptable. Wikipedia is not for WP:ADVOCACY, especially at the expense of WP:BLP. FourViolas (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Query

Ross, can you explain this edit? SarahSV ^(talk) 16:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

I came here yesterday to block you, assuming you were some drive-by vandal, but I discovered instead that you're an experienced editor, so I asked for an explanation. The only person you harm with an edit like that (which I see is not a one-off) is yourself, because it reduces people's trust in you. I hope you'll try to restore that trust from now on. SarahSV ^(talk) 16:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents, 2005, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2016 Ansbach bombing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2016 Ansbach bombing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 186.6.37.112 (talk) 00:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for 2016 Ansbach bombing

An article that you have been involved in editing—2016 Ansbach bombing—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Milwaukee riot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Milwaukee riot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Milwaukee riot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2016 Milwaukee riot. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese Embassy in Bishkek bombing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uyghur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 2016 Manhattan bombing a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 2016 Manhattan explosion. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. epicgenius (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Lori Erica Ruff identified

Lori Erica Ruff was just identified as Kimberly McLean, of Pennsylvania. Just thought I'd give you a heads-up!--GouramiWatcher^Talk 21:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2016 Cascade Mall shooting. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - MrX 02:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents in 2006, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mujahedeen Shura Council and Haldibari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Agricultural Penitentiary of Monte Cristo riot) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Agricultural Penitentiary of Monte Cristo riot, Rossbawse!

Wikipedia editor WebCite just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your article has been reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on WebCite's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

November 2016

Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vehicular assault as a terrorist tactic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 05:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rossbawse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Care to explain this edit?

[1]? Seriously. You better have a good explanation for that one.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

You've been editing since I posted the above question so I assume you've seen it. Still waiting on an explanation.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Still waiting for an explanation.Volunteer Marek (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

This lack of accountability for bad behavior seems to be a pattern; see #Use of double parentheses#Use of triple parentheses and #Query. Rossbawse, you've been warned about WP:SOAP and WP:BLP already; can you offer some assurance that these problems will not continue? FourViolas (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Edited 22:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

What's the #Use of double parentheses thing? Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Triple parentheses, not double. It's troubling that this user will not respond to legitimate concerns about their editing.- MrX 12:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Uh, yeah, this account needs to be indef'd per WP:NOTHERE. Like six months ago.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Faithful Word Baptist Church. This edit was not properly sourced and you gave no indication in your edit summary where it came from. In a similar vein, This edit makes no sense. If you do not understand that "2 people missing" is not a type of non fatal injury, then you should consider whether editing on Wikipedia is for you. You have been warned several times before, and you seem uninterested in communicating with other editor about these concerns, so consider this a final warning that if you continue to make unconstructive edits; add unsourced material; or engage in antisemitic vandalism, I will seek for your account to be blocked. - MrX 21:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Berlin attack. Littlecarmen (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 French riots for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 French riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 French riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 16:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atlanta prison riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

American politics editing

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

London incident?

@Rossbawse: Could you please explain why you've gone ahead and moved the article without any consensus whatsoever and in direct opposition of the discussion on the talk? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

@Chrissymad: i didn't know there was a discussion Rossbawse (talk) 23:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Rossbawse Not doing your due diligence isn't an excuse to go against WP:CONSENSUS. Please fix this. Additionally, what verification do you have that it's an attack or terrorism? BBC and other RS have been very careful not to confirm either. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

In fairness, it looks like that ship has sailed. We now have multiple independent reports of stabbings. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of 2017 Plano shooting

The article 2017 Plano shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a newspaper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 Plano shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Plano shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Plano shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Marquette Park rallies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Marquette Park rallies, Rossbawse!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks. Please integrate into Marquette Park (Chicago)#History. Collapse of NSPA is WP:COATRACK here, and belongs on the NSPA page instead.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 04:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Rossbawse. I noticed you've done some constructive editing recently. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. User:Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rossbawse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections has been nominated for discussion

Category:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^Falling_Gravity 01:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Pill Hill, Chicago

An article that you have been involved in editing—Pill Hill, Chicago—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mpen320 (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Not quite, but you have been involved in the editing of Calumet Heights, Chicago, the article in which I seek to merge--Mpen320 (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Joe Chandler III.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joe Chandler III.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rossbawse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elohim City, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Than you for creating Pablo Antonio Serrano-Vitorino. I tis one of what may be a significant number of articles that ought to be added to List of crimes committed in the United States by illegal aliens. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Notre-Dame de Paris

On 15 April 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Notre-Dame de Paris, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings#Urgent: Tell Twitter and YouTube to remove these accounts that belong to the perpetrators of the attacks

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings#Urgent: Tell Twitter and YouTube to remove these accounts that belong to the perpetrators of the attacks. 2600:1700:BBD0:8050:796A:F7DB:EFDF:F2A6 (talk) 05:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of April 2019 Kalmunai shootout

The article April 2019 Kalmunai shootout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered in the intro and aftermath section of the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings. This incident occured during search operations that are taking place following the bombing. Also per WP:DEL#5.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 22:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

I-65 Killer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, I-65 Killer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 23:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Sarajevo shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Sarajevo shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Sarajevo shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:I-65 Killer

Hello, Rossbawse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "I-65 Killer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smail Tulja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jesse McFadden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse McFadden, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse McFadden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aaron Saucedo

The article Aaron Saucedo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PERPETRATOR. The individual is not otherwise a celebrity, and no unusual motivation is being indicated

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Saucedo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Saucedo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Saucedo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nat Gertler (talk) 14:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Euronymous, you may be blocked from editing. Still adding unreferenced content despite years of warnings. TylerBurden (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello. In your edit here, you added a topic for [Category:Heads of state who denied the Holocaust]. However looking at the article, the subject condemned the Holocaust and condemned Croats who collaborated in carrying out the Holocaust. While the subject made past remarks downplaying the number of victims and making antisemitic remarks which they appeared to have trued to later denounce, it doesn’t appear they denied the atrocity itself. Is there a source to back your edit? Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 13:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)