User talk:RoslinGenetics

This is RoslinGenetics's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RoslinGenetics, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Stalwart111

Test[edit]

Test RoslinGenetics (talk) 23:45, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Hi RoslinGenetics! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Secular Society[edit]

Please note that it's inappropriate to add the word "keep" to the comments made by other users that you copied from Talk:Scottish Secular Society and pasted into the above-linked AfD discussion (diff page, diff page). I have stricken those within the discussion, because they are not valid !votes performed by those actual users. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Thank you in advance for your consideration regarding this matter. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Northamerica1000 Many thanks for the feedback as a new user - mea culpa. I will be making comment to the same effect on the deletion page to explain my actions. I originally had mentioned that I had copied and pasted these from the quick delete tread of the same page subsequently edited out by an othere user, I hadn't realized that the keep was an actual vote. I will contact the users to advise them of their formatting error

		The Original Barnstar
		Your good-faith attempt to give a voice to those editors was then muddied when I removed your quotation notes thinking they were formatting errors. Much of the blame for the subsequent misunderstanding should be attributed to me! Your response to NA1000 was calm and friendly nonetheless. That's exactly the sort of thing the community loves to see from new editors. Keep up the great work! Stalwart111 00:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey![edit]

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maynstonfield Mill (October 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maynstonfield Mill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maynstonfield Mill[edit]

Hello, RoslinGenetics. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Maynstonfield Mill".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester meetup 36 - 9 June 2019[edit]

As you attended one of the previous two Manchester meetups and/or expressed an interest in being notified about future ones, this is a heads-up that I have started organising a meetup in Manchester on 9 June 2019 - details are at m:Meetup/Manchester/36. Please feel free to invite others with an interest in Wikimedia/Wikipedia to join us. Thryduulf (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]