User talk:Rohmann

Edit warring at Tablo[edit]

Please get consensus for your changes at Talk:Tablo. If you continue to revert the article with no discussion, and without attempting to persuade the other editors, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That also goes for your deletion of Tablo from List of Stanford University people. --MelanieN (talk) 03:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite these warnings, you have reverted my posts again at Tablo within minutes of my posting them. I am going to recommend to the administrator above that you should be blocked for edit warring. --MelanieN (talk) 03:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Tablo. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

You are repeatedly taking out well-sourced material from the article. You are expected to observe an especially high standard when editing articles about living persons. If you are unwilling to follow our policies, you should not be editing here. EdJohnston (talk) 03:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

firstly I have no idea why I am blocked in the first place. I have written information that is all true.

Secondly this user Melaine should be the one blocked as she has absolutely no information that is true. She obviously does not speak or understand Korean which is where all the information and source I have given comes from. I even doubt if she is qualified to even edit this page or to report someone without any understanding of Korean.

Lastly, I would like to give citations of the information I have written. But since you guys are blocking me by listening only to Melaine I can't.

I think this system adopted by wikipedia is absolutely at fault and needs revision. Anybody could make false clasims and report anybody under this system and save me time writing this in the first place

I would like to report Melaine as well. I just don't know how to.

Decline reason:

You're not blocked because of the content of your edits; you are blocked solely because you were engaging in an edit war. However -- if you continue along the lines you have been, without sufficient attention to our biographies of living persons policy, you will likely be blocked for a longer period. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

an edit war? OK. I would like to know what happened to the user MelanieN. She obviously was engaged in an edit war with me? Is she blocked like me? I honestly ask you jpgordan or MelanieN what sole right you have of reporting or blocking people in the first place I thought wikipedia was about giving factual correct and up to date information. Obviously editing is only for those who are allowed and the casual user don't have a chance of editing a thing. You say I was engaged in an edit war? Yes thats true. Maybe because I was trying to edit factural information. Something MelanieN has absolutlely no qualifications as she does not understand a word of Korean. The claims that she makes have all been refuted by the Korean media. If she actually paid attention she would know that but then again she doesn't understand Korean does she? I don't know what you guys are trying to get at for blocking me for writing factual information. Get rid of this block. And please wikipedia if your gonna block someone in 5 seconds you should at least report back in 5 minutes not 30 minutes later with hardly any reasoning. I honestly thought wikipedia was about finiding the truth. I;m sure I;m wrong now. jpgordan do your job and get back to me more quickly. Instead of surfing random sites doing absolutly nothing.

Decline reason:

One should not compose an unblock request while snarling. Declined due to the personal attacks against jpgordon; keep insulting other editors and I'll extend your block. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 06:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rohmann (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MelanieN and jpgordan read this[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohmann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

read this 미국 명문 스탠퍼드대학교 영문과 학·석사과정을 졸업한 사실이 확인된 에픽하이의 타블로(본명 이선웅)의 학력위조설이 수그러들 줄 모르고 있다.

지난 7일 한 매체가 미국 내 관련기관에 의뢰해 학력인증서를 확인한 결과 타블로의 영문 이름인 대니얼 선웅 리(Daniel Seon-Woong Lee)가 학사와 석사 학위를 받은 사실이 확인됐지만 논란은 더 커지고 있는 상황이다.

인증서에는 타블로가 1996년 9월 스탠퍼드 대학 영문과에 입학해 2004년 석사학위를 취득한 것으로 나타났다.

네티즌들은 “80년 생인 타블로가 96년도에 입학하는 것은 불가능하다”면서 또한 “그가 방송에서 말한 리즈 위더스푼, 첼시 클린턴과의 일화들도 시기상 맞지 않는다”고 반박했다.

인터넷 포털 사이트 등에는 ‘타블로 학력위조 카페’ 등이 생겨났다. 계속 되는 논란에 대해 네티즌들은 예전 도올 김용옥 선생의 하버드 대학 학력 위조설때처럼 논문 번호와 졸업 증명서를 게재해 하루 빨리 논란을 마무리 짓자는 의견들이 나오고 있다.

and tell me that I am engaged in an edit war. Oh I'm sorry you can't read Korean. Then what right do you have of reporting me or blocking me?

I want an answer for that.

If you don't know don't comment.

Decline reason:

Determining what is and what isn't an edit war has nothing to do with reading foreign languages. All contributions to articles are in English; it's sufficient that the reporting user and the blocking admin can read your, and the other user's, English. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Rohmann (talk) 05:04, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Rohmann, you keep saying that I should not write about Tablo because I can't read Korean. However, the information that I have provided is about Stanford, and so it is necessarily in English, which I CAN read. Those Stanford sources have provided definitive proof that Tablo did graduate from Stanford with bachelor's and master's degrees, a fact that you keep challenging. I have allowed your section about other "controversies" to remain in the article, since you have provided sources for at least some of them. But there is no "controversy" about the fact that he did graduate from Stanford in 2002 with Bachelor's and Master's degrees in English. That has been proven by independent reliable sources as required by Wikipedia. It is hard to imagine how any sources in Korean could be more authoritative about his graduation than the information from Stanford itself. You insist that his graduation is not "proven" to your satisfaction, but it IS proven to the satisfaction of Wikipedia, and so it needs to remain in the article. If you keep deleting it, you will demonstrate that you do not accept Wikipedia's procedures or standards, and that could result in your losing your ability to post here. --MelanieN (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]