User talk:Robinboast

Speedy deletion of Dr. Robin Boast

A tag has been placed on Dr. Robin Boast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jrothwell ^{(? | !)} 15:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:R_Boast.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:R_Boast.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Academic-bio-stub, you will be blocked from editing. Kingturtle (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Autobio

I have a special dislike of people who copy a great chunk of their website, post it here and think they have created a Wikipedia article. Other people take the time to write articles especially for Wikipedia. In any case please read WP:AUTO. I recommend you to wait until someone writes your bio for you. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Ramesh Srinivasan

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ramesh Srinivasan, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mamk.net/?p=1916. As a copyright violation, Ramesh Srinivasan appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ramesh Srinivasan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ramesh Srinivasan and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ramesh Srinivasan with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ramesh Srinivasan.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. JNW (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. JNW (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)