User talk:Roberboy

I was wrongly block for my miss wording when i stated "this photo can be asked for permission post by author via email" i meant that the Real Author could be contacted to post himself. Not saying that i am the author who posted it. Rufisch lied and said i itmitted being a sockpuppet. WOW

If you want to ask to be unblocked, please post {{unblock}} at the bottom of your page. For what it's worth, I did not block you as I am not a neutral party here. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roberboy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I suspect you are yet another sockpuppet of User:Rubohcity. Please see WP:SOCK. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roberboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was confused as a sockpuppet by an editor when when i chose bad wording and got misinterpretted when i said "this photo can be asked for permission post by author via email" when i meant that the Real Author could be contacted to post himself on a photo discussion page. Not saying that i am the author who posted it. The editor even seems to understand that he made a mistake as he guided me into being unblocked. Plus the blockee did not even investigate the claim made by editor going purely by his/her word and assumed. p.s. also my i.p. has been blocked

Decline reason:

You just happened to accidentally admit it, edit the same articles, post to talk pages in the same format, comment on the same talk pages and have the same dislike for CAPS — Smashville^talk 01:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Plus, while logged out, you added a hangon tag here as Rubohcity...but you claim an edit made by Roberboy here. --Smashville^talk 01:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roberboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

with all due respects heres the explanation, i come to wikipedia ocasionally everyday but never (cause really i never see anything wrong) but then upon searching the Akron article i noticed it and been blocked with dramatic changes (missing data and pictures) with no explanation, due to noone stepping forward i decided myself to attempt a clean up during what looked like chaos. i am asking you please look into this and investigate. also i have no dislike of "Caps"...(it was for some reason stated earlier.

Decline reason:

Removing duplicate request - you only need one up at a time. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roberboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can i please get reasons to why his thought, I didnt even know of the editor/sockpuppet til the beginning of the events (january 19) let alone what a sockpuppet meant. any doubt put forward i can truthfully disprove with all due respect, look i only prefer not to use capital letters cause im on conputer which i usually do not use the shift button it was my way of learning and 'net-talk' orignal message if required: with all due respects heres the explanation, i come to wikipedia ocasionally everyday but never (cause really i never see anything wrong) but then upon searching the Akron article i noticed it and been blocked with dramatic changes (missing data and pictures) with no explanation, due to noone stepping forward i decided myself to attempt a clean up during what looked like chaos. i am asking you please look into this and investigate. also i have no dislike of "Caps"...(it was for some reason stated earlier. i cant view the link you put cause im not an admistrator, what does it say? your probably referring to my bad wording.

Decline reason:

Your edits, and the pages you are interested in editing, have a striking similarity to another user, and your account was created shortly after that user was blocked. This leads us to believe you are the same person, and that this account is a "sockpuppet", another incarnation of a previously blocked user. This is not allowed under Wikipedia policy, and so you have been blocked. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.