User talk:Ritabharidevi

Welcome

Hello, Ritabharidevi, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 05:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Mastram (web series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mastram (web series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon 06:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mastram (web series) (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mastram (web series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mastram (web series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Ritabharidevi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

A lengthy welcome

Hi Ritabharidevi. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Eka

Welcome and please note that disambiguation pages like Eka are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
• Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Requesting help

Hi greetings,

I have been looking for update and expansion support for 2 following articles in draft namespace

• Draft:Aurat (word) (article to cover grammar and linguistic part)

and

• Draft:Aurat (article to cover cultural women)

Please do have a look at the article, do update, expand, correct inaccuracies, suggest and discuss better article titles

Looking forward to your kind support.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siachenline.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siachenline.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siachenline.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siachenline.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Please see

Please see this section Talk:2020 China–India skirmishes#Addition of citation related to an edit of yours. DTM (talk) 11:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rehana Fathima for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rehana Fathima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehana Fathima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Demchok, Ladakh does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Edit on Meena Harris

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Glad to have you :) I just wanted to let you know that I removed part of your edit on Meena Harris, because it wasn't verified by the source you provided.

Specifically, the info that said Harris met her husband at Facebook in 2007 wasn't in the inline citation that you added. When you add a citation at the end of a sentence, it needs to support all of the facts in that sentence - not just some. Otherwise, the sentence loses its text-source integrity.

The children's names and years of birth also were not sourced, so I removed those. Names and birthdays of living people (that aren't written about widely) usually shouldn't be added to an article, since it can become a privacy issue for those people (please read WP:BLPPRIVACY).

In the future, please make sure that the sources you add at the end of a sentence verify all of the facts in that sentence. I hope these explanations were helpful. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Best, - Whisperjanes (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Irrelevant citations

Hello Ritabharidevi, please do not add irrelevant citations to articles. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 22:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Repeating the same issues again and again is disruptive. Please don't do it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

This is another prod to write edit summaries for your edits. (see alert above). Less than 5% of your edits have edit summaries according to the system. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Also, please avoid adding citations to content that is already well-cited. If the existing citations are not adequate, that should be explained in the edit summary or on the talk page. Once your edit carried no edit summary!-- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Siachenline.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Siachenline.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mastram (web series)

Hello, Ritabharidevi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mastram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Kamalika Chanda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kamalika Chanda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 19:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For diligent work on the article: Queen Didda. Peter Ormond (talk) 02:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Add Bibliography to the article Queen Didda

Please add the bibliography for the author 'Chandra', which you mentioned in the article Queen Didda. Thank You. Peter Ormond (talk) 02:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop CITESPAM

Do not add random newspaper links in the middle of historical articles or sections. Newspapers are not reliable sources for history in any case. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:COMMONAME

Please maintain WP:COMMONNAME, the district and the division names are still 'Faizabad' in Wikipedia. If you want you can request a move in any of the article talk pages. Otherwise your edits are disruptive. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khushboo Atre

The article Khushboo Atre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actress with a few minor roles. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit summary

Firstly at the top, it was stated that he is a medical physician so no need to repeat that later. Secondly "He has published booklet versions of lectures on Islam and comparative religion" was added in the publications section. Thirdly, no valid reference found that buttress he is promoting Wahabism or Salafi Ideology. Let it clear, suppose you are a public speaker I am alleging that you are promoting terrorism but I have no evidence that exactly where you promoted or by which lecture or part of lecture you promoted terrorism, is it make any sense? Fourthly, his preaching is not banned his TV channel is banned only but it can be accessed through the internet. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mastram (web series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mastram (web series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastram (web series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SwashWafer (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Image in Nigaar Khan and Rubina Dilaik

Hi User:Ritabharidevi please stop changing the images in Nigaar Khan & Rubina Dilaik the images that was there before was better so please don’t — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:108F:BA02:BD64:77D6 (talk) 22:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Discuss, please

Hi there, re: this edit, when changes you make are reverted, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the change you wish to make, not to re-revert it. This constitutes edit-warring, which is a disruptive behaviour at a community-based editing project. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: : Sorry, but I thought some anonymous IP address is vandalizing those pages, as the user has not logged in and perhaps edited only those pages on Wikipedia. I wanted to go to status-quo of those pages before that IP address made changes.--Ritabharidevi (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Ritabharidevi I have not made any vandalism I just changed the images back as there was no problem with the ones that were on before and I had told you repeatedly stop and you kept doing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:4C:C9F5:C049:D4F1 (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take back the report because I did no vandalism. I told you repeatedly that if you keep rv the edits you will be reported — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:5161:B00:A696:B519 (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Ritabharidevi, editors don't have to have accounts to be able to contribute. In this instance, the editor at that IP explained why they made the change. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Baramulla, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: I have added the source for the info.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/pakistan-armys-operation-gulmarg-oct-1947/
--Ritabharidevi (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

A blog post? In a newspaper, that is not considered reliable at WP:RSP? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

You made an edit to the article on Kashmir Valley that changed Region of Kashmir administered by India as the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir to India. Please could you read Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_69#A_proposal_for_Kashmir-related_pages_on_this_notable_day_for_India_and_Pakistan. The proposals seem to have been generally agreed. So you will understand why your edit to Kashmir Valley has been reverted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

You made an edit to the article on Ladakh that changed the map. I am not convinced that the map you used is the right map. Please see Talk:Ladakh#Regarding the India Pakistan consensus of August 2019 about what map can be in the infobox.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You need to explain edits such as changing the map or the text using an edit summary. You have been told about this before. Your recent edit to Ladakh did not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Adding citations

Hi Ritabharidevi, first of all, it is a poor idea to add citations to content that is already well-cited. It is even worse, if you stick your citations in the middle of paragraphs so that it is not even clear any more which content is sourced to what. If you do this again please assume that it will get reverted. Please read and understand WP:INTEGRITY. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rehana Fathima for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rehana Fathima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehana Fathima (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 13:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Parlour Wali Larki.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parlour Wali Larki.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Oindrila Sen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oindrila Sen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oindrila Sen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)