User talk:Rishsehgal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Rishsehgal, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --Animalparty-- (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mesenteric Organ has been accepted[edit]

Mesenteric Organ, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JustBerry (talk) 06:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

regarding title change, and citations[edit]

In response to your email regarding title changes to Mesenteric Organ, that is discussed at WP:MOVE. Please note that under WP:TITLEFORMAT guidelines, titles should be lowercase except for proper nouns. You might also be interested in the Manual of Style for Medicine-related articles, and an introduction to referencing, since the citation style currently in Mesenteric Organ (e.g. <sub>[1,3]</sub>), while sufficient for print-based articles, is not suited to the dynamic editing style of Wikipedia, since subsequent additions may change the reference number, and it would be quite easy to lose the footnote-to-source correlation, which would reduce verifiability. A referencing style in the form of "<ref name=Smith03>Smith, Joe (2003). Article. Journal, etc.</ref>" is the best way to automatically generate line footnotes and a numbered list of references. Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 18:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you. Would it be possible for me to mesh my article (which as you can appreciate is very extensive and up to date) with the 'mesentery' article, which is poorly written, poorly cited and out-dated? I dont seem to have a MOVE option in my account. I really appreciate your help. Rishabh Sehgal, MD, MRCSI (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid human anatomy is out of my league, so I cannot give good guidance on what should be merged. You might want to discuss how best to merge content on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page: there is already a discussion of your article here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy#AfC_article_of_relevance, and the WP Anatomy editors will have better suggestions and insight than I. All the best, --Animalparty-- (talk) 07:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mesentery may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:354–65.</ref><sup>[</sup> Total or Complete mesocolic excision (CME), utilize planar surgery and extensive

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to Mesentery, RishSeghal. A quick google search reveals you have a close connection with an author of a large number of references you have inserted in mesentery. Whilst your edits are most appreciated and benefiting thousands of readers, please note that you are likely to have a conflict of interest. See here for more WP:COI

Here on Wikipedia we give preference to secondary, rather than primary sources. See here for more WP:MEDRS. We tend to lag behind the "cutting edge" until theories become accepted conventionally fact. See here for more WP:UNDUE.

Please let me know if you have any questions. --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]