User talk:RichardMathews

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome from Redwolf24[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 13 May 2024 T 08:56 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

Excellent contribution[edit]

As a longtime editor of the creation-evolution controversy I'd like to thank you for your contribution to that article. It was sorely needed. Joshuaschroeder 00:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SSP[edit]

Hello RichardMathwes. I have noticed that you have edited the SSP page several times. I was wondering if we can work togeather to further expand it.--BorisFromStockdale 05:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Your message at Requests for feedback

You can find live help on Wikipedia's
help chat
Hello, RichardMathews. Bejinhan replied to your request for feedback.
Best regards, Bejinhan talks 11:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Jerry Nelson (astronomer)[edit]

Hi, your article qualifies for a WP:DYK. Would you like to submit one or do you want me to do it for you? You will still get credit if I submit for you. Cheers and looking forward to your reply, Bejinhan talks 11:07, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edits. They look good. I also removed the birth day/month since that came from the blacklisted source.
Thanks also for the DYK suggestion. I don't know anything about that process. I'd appreciate it if you would submit it.--RichardMathews (talk) 22:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I've added the DYK submission here. Feel free to take a look at it. Bejinhan talks 03:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jerry Nelson (astronomer)[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Nelson[edit]

Thanks for providing categorizations of the Jerry Nelson and SSP articles.

The guidelines for importance ratings say that High includes "All astronomers who won major prizes or awards besides the Nobel Prize." Since Nelson won the Kavli prize for astrophysics, doesn't that put him in this category? The Kavli has been called the "New Nobel" and the "Next Nobel" (though it has a bit of a different focus). The Kavli certainly conveys considerable prestige and fortune (a million dollars). What do the guidelines mean by "major prize" if not the Kavli?

Well, for major prize I usually think in terms of the Nobel or the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society. It looks like the Kavli has only recently been founded and I'm still unclear about the level of prestige it denotes. But fine, it can be made a high. That'll put him in the same group as Nicolaus Copernicus, John Herschel, Fred Hoyle and Johannes Kepler. :-)

I also think the Nelson article deserves better than a Start rating. It is certainly well sourced and verifiable, and it contains a decent amount of information on Nelson's life and work. It earned a DYK on the Wikipedia front page. Other available biographies have no more information about him. A biography of a living person cannot delve too deep into private life, and it would not be appropriate to do original research into his life. I think at least a B Class would be reasonable. If there is anything keeping it from going all the way to GA, I'd like to know what that is in order to address the problems. --RichardMathews (talk) 22:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It just looked like a start to me. The citations are unformatted and the article is fairly brief. For some sample B articles on astronomers, see John Couch Adams, George Biddell Airy and Fred Hoyle.
If you feel like I have rated you unjustly, I suggest asking at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy for another editor to review the ratings. Thank you.—RJH (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jerold Krieger[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Scott Pace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jerry Earl Nelson.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Climate Hawks Vote has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Climate Hawks Vote. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Climate Hawks Vote has been accepted[edit]

Climate Hawks Vote, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Climate Hawks Vote[edit]

Just accepted this submission. From the talkpage it appears you have a conflict of interest, thank you for declaring it. The relevant guidelines are at WP:COI, they discourage editors from directly editing the article, and encourage instead making suggestions at the article talkpage. If you have any questions, feel free to reply here, I have your talkpage on my watchlist. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Joseph. It is because I am aware of WP:COI that I took the precaution of submitting this through AfC rather than just creating it myself. It's good to have an extra pair of eyes to make sure I am treating the subject fairly.
I do feel that this should be well above Start-Class. It thoroughly covers all of the material available in all reliable sources. I think I write pretty well. This could be B-Class, and I could see it not taking much to take this to GA. I have submitted to Project U.S. for assessment.
I am also interested in taking this to DYK.RichardMathews (talk) 16:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Climate Hawks Vote[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Climate Hawks Vote at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 09:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Climate Hawks Vote[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, RichardMathews. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, RichardMathews. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, RichardMathews. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Grossman Marc.jpg[edit]

Notice

The file File:Grossman Marc.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RichardMathews&oldid=1139290285"