User talk:Rich Coburn

August 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 00:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rich Coburn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19108 was submitted on Aug 30, 2017 02:03:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rich Coburn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Jeh is a sockpuppet of likesbridges. His alias admin account is ohnoitsjamie. I've sent a private email to one of the arbitrators since no admins could be bothered to assist. Email me for more info I'm not discussing this on an open forum. Rich Coburn (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rich Coburn (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rich Coburn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Re: above, the reason should be pretty obvious, I was accused of being a sockpuppet Jagawegen, which ofc I am most certainly not. And nor is Jagawegen a sock.. Jeh AKA Guy Harris AKA ohnoitsjamie AKA fuck knows who else had Jagawegen banned. Jeh is a sock of Morning227 (either that or Orange Moody I forget the name). The ohnoitsjamie account was created in 2006. Anyway long story short, I'm not a sock, so please unblock me. Thanks. At the very least it'll be easier to start proceedings against J,E.H., something which should have been done long ago. P.S. Whether this appeal is granted or not J. E. H. will not receive any free publicity. Future correspondence will still be via private email. Sorry JEH. Rich Coburn (talk) 13:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's enough. Revoking talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

On the advice of Jeh, I will drop the "sock" charges" and am willing to go down to "meat". At any rate, the real charge stands: editor isn't here to improve the project, has made wild and strange personal attacks, and is a pain. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rich Coburn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19119 was submitted on Aug 31, 2017 00:07:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]