User talk:Rex495

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD nomination of Philip Solomon[edit]

I've nominated Philip Solomon, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Philip Solomon satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Solomon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Philip Solomon during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - Cybergoth 17:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Wiki supposed to be a giant repository of info? Certainly the author of numerous psychology texts and a leader of the field for at least a generation should be noted, if for nothing else than being the spouse of a us senator...however poorly I've written it.Rex495 05:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)rex495[reply]

AfD nomination of Houston jewelry[edit]

Houston jewelry, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Houston jewelry satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houston jewelry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Houston jewelry during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Karanacs 16:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page documents the family & economic history during the earliest periods of the state of Texas and Houston. The Jewelers of America, JA have asked Houston Jewelry to join the JA 100 Club in the class of 2007 which includes retail stores that have been in business for over 100 years. http://www.jewelers.org/membership/JA100club.html. What other documentation is needed, we do have boxes and boxes of papers in our vault to document this history. As for the history of retailing, the development and later disolving of the catalog showroom industry is clearly reflected in this story, which should be of use to any student of retailing history. Unfortunately the trade magazines that wrote many stories on the history of the company are now extinct, and never made it to the web age. However here is a recent link to a story http://66.201.106.163/portal_FullMazalUbracha.asp?id=25332 I freely admit my writing style is verbose, and conversational, and I welcome edit This editor would like to see it fixed and stay. Rex495 05:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)rex495[reply]

You might want to make sure that you are familiar with the conflict of interest guidelines, as your comments make it appear that you are closely connected to the subject of the article in question. (Not meaning to imply you've violated them, but if the article survives AFD it could be useful.) Karanacs 18:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I've found similar wiki articles on Brendles, Witmark, & Service Merchandice, all of which apparently survive the editing process, so why does the only verified survivor of the catalog showroom industry not merit inclusion. There numerous articles about the company, easily findable on google, such as: http://jck.polygon.net/archives/1999/06/jc06-237.html "Can Service Merchandice Survive?" http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1993_1172510 "A Gem of A Comeback". While I clear acknowledge that my prose is poor and cluttered and should be edited, the information is relevant. Rex495 (talk) 06:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)rex495[reply]

Thanks for your note. And thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Wikipedia has encyclopedic guidelines for articles about businesses. Please read WP:CORP to review those. Sources for articles must be verfiable. Please read WP:V for more info. I see no one laid a welcome on you. That's the big blue box you see now 'cause i'm laying one on you now. There's a link to the Manual of Style amongst the links that will help you make the article more concise and more encyclopedic. Hope this helps. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rex495! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Thanks for your note.

Just because other not notables have articles does not make an Houston Jewelry notable. If you have information that supports a claim of meeting notability or verifiability requirements, please appeal the deletion at deletion review.
Did you spell Brendles correctly? I don't see that article. The Witmark article says the company had a 34% share of the market. That sounds like a company that meets the notability guideline for companies. Service Merchandise "was the nation's top catalog-showroom retailer." That sounds like meeting WP:CORP to me.
As I recall, Houston Jewelry was a local Texas retailer. Although longlived, it was never nationally know as a household name, as was Service Merchandise. The links you provided seem to me to support a claim of local notability. A single write up mentioning Houston Jeweleres and Service Merchandise together does not necessarily amount to significant media coverage. The other article says it is "A local institution."
The quality of your prose is not a factor nor should it be. Writing quality is not a factor in determining whether or not an article should be included on Wikipedia. Generally, the discussion ceters on the subject's notability and the verifiability of the sources. Sorry I could not be more helpful. I will try to take another look at the issue next week, but will be busy with my job until Tuesday. The closing admin was User:Haemo and you can leave him a message at User talk:Haemo. Please note that I am not an admin. For more information on the deletion process, click User:Dlohcierekim/deletion. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 16:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with John Thornton Knight[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, John Thornton Knight, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:fpzUd1XrePoJ:oursoutherncousins.com/Descendants%2520of%2520Eliz%2520Woodson%2520%26%2520John%2520Knight.doc+John+Thornton+Knight,+was+a+brilliant+officer+in+the+United+States+Army&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. As a copyright violation, John Thornton Knight appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. John Thornton Knight has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:John Thornton Knight and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:John Thornton Knight with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:John Thornton Knight.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Whispering 05:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Houston Jewelry & Distributing Company, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://knol.google.com/k/google/houston-jewelry/jjmq7rcc2t02/2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Houston Jewelry & Distributing Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vipin Hari || talk 05:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 12:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Rex495! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 12:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rex495. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Texas Jewelers Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 17:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avraham Yaakov Gelman (March 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 07:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Rex495. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Avraham Yaakov Gelman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]