User talk:Regisaurusjacobi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regisaurusjacobi, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Regisaurusjacobi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you'd better watch out, you'd better not cry, you'd better not pout, I'm telling you why

Christmas Velociraptor is coming to town

He sees you when you sleeping, he knows when you're awake, he knows if you've been bad or good, so be good for your life's sake

Oh, you'd better watch out, you'd better not cry, you'd better not pout, I'm telling you why

Christmas Velociraptor is coming to town


Merry Christmas, and watch out for the Christmas Velociraptor, IJReid (talk) 25 December 2014

A page you started (Tamboeria) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Tamboeria, Regisaurusjacobi!

Wikipedia editor DocumentError just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good job

To reply, leave a comment on DocumentError's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

February 2015[edit]

who the is writing this crap i mean people just go to the jitterydragon wiki , make a page ,dont write crap on it and expect for some retard to write the rest i mean who in the world would think that. maybe some loser just went to their computer made a page on the jitterydragon wiki . forgets all about it and nobody sees it for years. just forgotten somewhere in a jungle. this is disgrceful , i am saying what retard even did this. you know what $#%@ this page . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiregisaurus (talkcontribs) 14:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

The next time I see that you've vandalised a page (including making disruptive page moves) I will block you. I don't know what has got you so annoyed but I strongly suggest that you think carefully before editing Wikipedia like that again. BencherliteTalk 14:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Bencherlite, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SchroCat (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I don't know what's going on here, but I've blocked you indefinitely until you can explain your vandalism of user pages and your statement that you've been vandalizing Wikipedia since 2012. --Laser brain (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Regisaurusjacobi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hello admins, you've seen some of my contributions. so I would take off the lock here.i already learned the lesson not to move user talk pages that are not mine. I was mad at another user and he was making me crazy. I ask you please.

to here is the link [1] of what the sentence that ive been a vandal since 2012 meant

Decline reason:

On balance, I'm unconvinced that unblocking you is in the best interests of the encyclopedia. PhilKnight (talk) 11:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Regisaurusjacobi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was not here for bad reasons.i just went mad at another user.in fact i did not even want to do the pagemove vandalism i did(most of my contributions were not bad.i was just mad because of something between me and User:FunkMonk.if i even knew this would happen then i would not do it.)i am very sorry for what i did,and i want to apologise for what i have done.i ask you please unblock me.i will promise you I will never edit Wikipedia again.just unblock me to delete this account and then I'm gone--Regisaurusjacobi 11:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Considering that you also created a sockpuppet account, I have to agree that unblocking you would not be in the best interests of the project. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why do you want the account unblocked if you are not planning to edit here again? Peridon (talk) 14:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
well,I'm very sorry for what I have done and,honestly I want to apologize for what I have done;-(--Regisaurusjacobi 14:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: For any admin considering unblocking this account (not that it seems likely), I want to point out that aside from page-move vandalism, this user has also threatened to kill two different users (here and here). You'll note from the second diff that he also operates under 87.228.204.54 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and possibly other socks. --Laser brain (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI NOTICE[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Regisaurusjacobi. Thank you.--Anningia (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]