User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/9
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Page interfaces and signatures
The bouncy logo on this page in vector covers the main navigation links, something about how vector treats the page contents differently than monobook. Since most people here use vector, could you please fix that?
More of an issue, however, is your signature - it's too long. I was just going to bring this up on IRC, but it's harder to demonstrate there. WP:SIG states that the maximum length for a signature is 255 characters, the hard limit imposed by the mediawiki, but you go around this by using a template. Now using one isn't necessarily a bad thing, can make it a target for vandalism and the like, but so long as it follows the other guideline and you watch your posts it should be fine. The problem here is that it doesn't follow the other guidelines, considering the sheer length. I pasted the result of one of the shorter variants directly into the preferences box and this was the result:
Now arguably that's already pretty long, but since the entirety of what I tried to paste was this, I hope you can see the problem:
Please, do something to make it shorter, 255 characters or less. It's very long, and the WP page is right; editing around such things can be somewhat bothersome. — Isarra (talk) 22:21, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Signature fixed. I've taken off the Not Rcs link. :( Dunno what to do about the bouncy logo though. Maybe I could make it smaller? Rcsprinter (natter) 22:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, mon. As for the logo, for it to work cross-skin probably the only thing you could do is make it fixed position like on your userpage - fixed positioning seems to ignore the relatively-positioned content container. Could also just optimise it for vector instead of monobook; it would go off the top of the page in monobook, but at least that way it should not cause problems for anyone using one of those two skins. Vector is a lot lower than monobook, and such. — Isarra (talk) 03:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Also, in your signature, what i the <font color... bit for? Nevermind that <font> is a deprecated tag, that bit appears to be overridden by the links anyway, so you should be able to optimise it a bit more pretty easily. — Isarra (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- I like that signature. It is a nice, sharp grey. Natter... Nope, can't tell you are British. Wish you would learn proper English like us Americans :) I found a nice bug in person-o-matic. They are fixing it. They've also adding names from a file, so it is almost ready to use. Bgwhite (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Is it ready yet? Rcsprinter (shout) 20:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- I like that signature. It is a nice, sharp grey. Natter... Nope, can't tell you are British. Wish you would learn proper English like us Americans :) I found a nice bug in person-o-matic. They are fixing it. They've also adding names from a file, so it is almost ready to use. Bgwhite (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 14:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Androzaniamy (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Please control your AWB settings
You recently introduced badminotn and inot to some pages. --Florentyna (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is OK, I fixed them a while ago and am working OK now. For some reason it was doing the inside of words too. Rcsprinter (message) 17:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Let's hope the best, the last wrong edits were from 17:13 and 17:16 today, means some minutes ago. --Florentyna (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
persondata-o-matic
New version is not available at Wikipedia:Persondata-o-matic. Bgwhite (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- New version is not available? Wtf? Go to this, I'll talk to you about it. Rcsprinter (lecture) 19:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
The Tea Leaf - Issue One - Recent news from the Teahouse
Hi! Welcome to the first edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!
%E3%81%A8%E5%AF%8C%E5%A3%AB%E5%B1%B1(%E3%81%B5%E3%81%98%E3%81%95%E3%82%93).jpg)
- Metrics are out from week one. Week one showed that the need for Teahouse hosts to invite new editors to the Teahouse is urgent for this pilot period. It also showed that emailing new users invitations is a powerful tool, with new editors responding more to emails than to talk page templates. We also learned that the customized database reports created for the Teahouse have the highest return rate of participation by invitees. Check out the metrics here and see how you can help with inviting in our Invitation Guide.
- A refreshed "Your hosts" page encourages experienced Wikipedians to learn about the Teahouse and participate. With community input, the Teahouse has updated the Your hosts page which details the host roles within the Teahouse pilot and the importance that hosts play in providing a friendly, special experience not always found on other welcome/help spaces on Wikipedia. It also explains how Teahouse hosts are important regarding metrics reporting during this pilot. Are you an experienced editor who wants to help out? Take a look at the new page today and start learning about the hosts tasks and how you can participate!
- Introduce yourself and meet new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. New & experienced editors to Wikipedia can add a brief infobox about themselves and get to know one another with direct links to userpages. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, they'll surely be happy to feel the wikilove!
You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
New guy question about one of your edits
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia and wanted to understand your recent edit to "David Atkinson (baritone)" and the revisions in March 2012. Who added the "James Young" verbiage and did you revert it? I'm looking to edit this entry but want to understand the recent revision history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmqyoung (talk • contribs) 15:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, just learned about Jmqyoung (talk) 16:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- The person who added the gunk names was a under an IP address 80.2.143.149, and I reverted it as it was not constructive, probably untrue and in any case unsourced, using a tool called Huggle. Thank you for your interest, I hope you become a good editor here on Wikipedia. Rcsprinter (gossip) 17:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I asked because David Atkinson is my uncle, and I just found this posted info on him and wanted to upload a picture of him (taken in 2001). It's also very coincidental because my name is also "James Young." Jmqyoung (talk) 19:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, it's what I do. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) 20:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I asked because David Atkinson is my uncle, and I just found this posted info on him and wanted to upload a picture of him (taken in 2001). It's also very coincidental because my name is also "James Young." Jmqyoung (talk) 19:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Adoption
Can you adopt me as a new user — Preceding unsigned comment added by World Flying (talk • contribs) 16:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Very sorry, but I'm a bit busy at the moment to take on another adoptee. Rcsprinter (shout) 11:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
March 2012 MOTD's award for helping the project in a difficult time
|
The MOTD Barnstar | |
| The MOTD Barnstar is awarded to Rcsprinter123 for his invaluable contribution to our project, which was experiencing a period of extreme scarcity. Thank you from Motto of the day. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC) |
Additional note: Hoping that you feel comfortable with us, we hope and desire that you will want to continue contributing to our/your project. I personally think that if many of us contribute, then about ten minutes per week, by reviewing the existing nominations, and eventually adding new nominations, should be more than enough to get the project going! Once again, thank you from your Motto of the day. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update
  Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Bot running wild
Hi, your wild animal User:RscprinterBot is linking Lozenge to Bullet in foreign languages. Please restrain it. Thanks! :) USchick (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I seriously doubt that, but SprinterBot has been running so I'll assume you mean him. Sorry for any inconvenience caused, the problem is that interwiki.py goes through all the languages and gets the links from what links to other things, so lozenge probably translates to bullet in Wansfikian or something. But I will do what I can. Rcsprinter (orate) 19:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- The edit on March 13 is still there [1] will it mess things up to undo it? And how do we keep it from relinking again? Thanks. USchick (talk) 02:24, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- It won't mess anything up to undo it because the bot has finished its cycle of 'sweeping the wiki' for now. So it won't relink it. If you want to be sure for the next time you can put {{Nobots}} on the page. Rcsprinter (chat) 18:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- The edit on March 13 is still there [1] will it mess things up to undo it? And how do we keep it from relinking again? Thanks. USchick (talk) 02:24, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
There is a question at the Teahouse you might have interest in...
 |
Dear Rcsprinter123, I just asked a question at the Teahouse that you might have interest in! I hope you'll stop by and participate! Sarah (talk) 01:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC) |
Teahouse Talkback Template Reminder
Hey Rcsprinter123! Just a reminder - please don't forget to use the Teahouse Talkback for the editors you provide answers too. Most new editors don't know about the watchlist gadget or think about checking back, and it does show that leaving the template helps. It's mentioned Host tips page and also on a general template collection we have that features all of our templates, thus far! I hope you find value and use in these! Thanks :) Sarah (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yeah. Oops. Rcsprinter (rap) 17:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Special Thanks for helping me make me bold! And thanks for calling me as a Vandilism Fighter. Although I am not in real life, I am a strong opposer against Vandalism! Teahouse is best suited for people like you! Monareal (talk) 16:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC) |
- Aw, this is a nice surprise. Thank you very much.
Rcsprinter (state the obvious (or not)) 16:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
RFPP
Hey. Your archiving script seems to archive faster than mine, but I can't tell what the difference is. The change (if there is one) might actually be an improvement. Do you know if there is a difference? I am using the original User:Rami_R/rfppClerk.js. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have absolutley no idea whether there is a difference. As far as I know, it is the same code which I run hourly. I'm thinking of using it to run a bot with a crontab to make the process automated and remove us (like VolkovBot did before it quit mysteriously), but haven't got round to it yet. Rcsprinter (lecture) 16:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- A bot would appear more serious, but it would also put more traffic on my watchlist, and that of any other admin looking to see what the status is. I try not to run the script myself unless there are a lot of changes to the queue since the last time the script was run. EdJohnston (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm very much a de-watchist. My advice is not to watch a page which is going to be edited frequently. Rcsprinter (message) 16:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- The point is to be notified *appropriately*. If I notice that there is a backlog, then I'm more likely to come and help with the queue. Also if I see that protection is being requested on an important page, I might take an interest. Somebody else was just scolded for a bot proposal that would have edited his own talk page once an *hour*. That seems like a waste of edits. EdJohnston (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- So....? Are you proposing the page stops being clerked? Rcsprinter (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- And, a bot editing would not trigger watchlists. Rcsprinter (chat) 17:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- I *want* to be notified if a backlog has developed since the last time I checked. Rami's clerking script puts this in the edit summary. (I would never bother looking at the page itself to look for a backlog notice, it would take too much time). If the edit summary was suppressed from my watchlist, I wouldn't get this helpful notice. EdJohnston (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- The point is to be notified *appropriately*. If I notice that there is a backlog, then I'm more likely to come and help with the queue. Also if I see that protection is being requested on an important page, I might take an interest. Somebody else was just scolded for a bot proposal that would have edited his own talk page once an *hour*. That seems like a waste of edits. EdJohnston (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm very much a de-watchist. My advice is not to watch a page which is going to be edited frequently. Rcsprinter (message) 16:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- A bot would appear more serious, but it would also put more traffic on my watchlist, and that of any other admin looking to see what the status is. I try not to run the script myself unless there are a lot of changes to the queue since the last time the script was run. EdJohnston (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
So the solution is to stay as we are. Problem solved, end of subject. Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) 17:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 March newsletter
We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! 
Grapple X (submissions), of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's 
Casliber (submissions), who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.
Congratulations to 
Matthewedwards (submissions), whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to 
12george1 (submissions), who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Wikipedia:Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from 
Miyagawa (submissions) show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!
It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
RE: Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bmusician's computer
The page was intended to be an April Fool's joke. Of course after 1 April was over, it should have been closed, like how you closed all of the other joke nominations. Why did you request speedy deletion of mine and not others'? I feel sad. Bmusician 00:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Suggestion for USERNOCAT bot
Hi Rcsprinter! While reviewing BattyBot's edits to remove article categories from user pages, I noticed it's removing categories such as Category:WikiProject Songs members. Therefore, I changed my F&R rules to the following: \[\[Category:(.*?)\]\](?<!(Wikipedia|WikiProject).*) → [[:Category:$1]] Thought you might want to do the same. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 03:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, that's fine. One thing I'm having trouble with is loading the whole of category:Living people into the make list thing, it only lets me have about 25000 articles, of which none are in userspace, so that's
. So I tried the approach of putting them in via a text file on my computer, but I'm struggling to do that because I can't find a way of getting a list of all pages in a category. So if you could help with that I'd be grateful. Thanks, Rcsprinter (whisper) 10:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- After you login to AWB with your bot account, go to the Plugins menu and load the NoLimitsPlugin, and you'll notice some new entries in your Source list. Choose "Category (NL, Admin & Bot)" and then Living people. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoingBatty (talk • contribs) 01:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, you're a lifesaver! Rcsprinter (speak) 10:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- After you login to AWB with your bot account, go to the Plugins menu and load the NoLimitsPlugin, and you'll notice some new entries in your Source list. Choose "Category (NL, Admin & Bot)" and then Living people. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoingBatty (talk • contribs) 01:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Also, I thought I could be more efficient and run through all the talk pages with {{user sandbox}} and {{userspace draft}}. However, based on feedback at User talk:BattyBot, I've also set up AWB so it skips user pages that contain <!-- [[Category:. GoingBatty (talk) 02:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
IRC
Whenever you come back on wp, Could you come back onto IRC as well. :) --Ceradon talkcontribs 17:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Would it be possible to move my hook back from Prep 4 to Prep 2, so it will air during the day in the U.S. on April 5? I'll gladly promote another ready hook with pic to take its place in Prep 4. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, it was set to air on April 5 in the UK. Don't the time zones overlap? Feel free to move it around as you wish. Don't have time to do it myself now. Rcsprinter (orate) 20:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March drive wrap-up
| Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months. Progress report During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (Talk), Stfg (Talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Re: Userpage
No connection to me. Just someone having fun at my expense :) --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sarah (talk) 21:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
WP Report
May 14 will do nicely. The interview looks good too. Welcome aboard! -Mabeenot (talk) 04:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Preston Passion
 | On 20 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Preston Passion, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 2012 Preston Passion featured thousands of Preston residents and included Surely He Hath Borne Our Griefs from Handel's Messiah? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Preston Passion.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Bushranger One ping only 00:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar Well done, for such a good original idea! Martinevans123 (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- What original idea was that? Creating an article about an event, I wonder...? Thanks for the star. Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) 19:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
I would like to change the title of article "Prince Fahad bin Faisal Al Saud" to "Fahad bin Faisal" since there are discussions about not including the words such as "prince, etc." to the titles. And if you review other bio articles of Saudi people there is no such words in the titles. So, if you fix it, I appreciate it. Thanks again.Egeymi (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Done. Article has been AfDd though. Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) 19:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Thanks so much Egeymi (talk) 20:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Re: Good humor
Thanks for the barnstar :) The sentence is a recent addition, as I recently was looking at my contribution history and realized that my peaks and troughs of activity were suspiciously anti-correlated with the amount of female action I was getting. I would be interested in an in-depth study on the topic, but I'm secretly hoping that my wiki activity drops sharply fairly soon :D -RunningOnBrains(talk) 03:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 April newsletter
Round 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's Grapple X (submissions) remains our top scorer with over 700 points; he continues to gain high numbers of points for his good articles on The X-Files, but also Millennium and other subjects. He has also gained points for a good topic, a featured list, multiple good article reviews and several did you knows. Pool E's Casliber (submissions) was second, thanks primarily to his biology articles, with Pool H's 
Muboshgu (submissions) coming in third, with an impressive 46 did you knows, mostly on the subject of baseball. Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both scored over 600 points. Pools E and H proved our most successful, with each seeing 5 members qualify for round 3, while Pools C and D were the least, with each seeing only 3 reach round 3. However, it was Pool G which saw the lowest scoring, with a little under 400 points combined; Pool H, the highest scoring group, saw over triple that score.
65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter: File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg, our first featured picture, was the work of both Matthewedwards (submissions) and 
Grandiose (submissions), the latter of whom has also gone on to score with File:Map of the Battle of Guam, 1944.svg. Bonus points also continue to roll in; this round, 
Ealdgyth (submissions) earned triple points for her good articles on William the Conqueror and the Middle Ages, Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both earned triple points for their work on Western Jackdaw, now a good article, 
Dana Boomer (submissions) earned triple points for her work on lettuce and work by 
Stone (submissions) to ready antimony for good article status earned him triple points. Jarry1250 (submissions) managed to expand Vitus Bering far enough for a did you know, which was also worth triple points. All of these highly important topics featured on 50 or more Wikipedias at the start of the year.
An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank Jarry1250 (submissions) and Stone (submissions), for continued help behind the scenes. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Skype
Can you get on Skype, please? Adam mugliston Talk 20:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- No. Wait until tomorrow. Rcsprinter (talk) 21:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Bots
Hi Rcsprinter123. I saw your comment at my BRFA and it reminded me of this unresolved discussion. Any update? 28bytes (talk) 21:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well I can't really see what I can do to resolve the problem because I was just running it the way I always have. Rcsprinter (state the obvious (or not)) 13:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Are you planning to start it up again at some point? 28bytes (talk) 18:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I expect so; although I'd like to move operations onto the toolserver to save my poor little laptop overheating when I have it running. I already have a toolserver account, don't know if you could help me. That way it could run 24/7. Rcsprinter (message) 20:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't have a toolserver account; TParis has one and may be able to help. 28bytes (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK then. Incidentally, how do you keep your bot running? Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) 20:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't have a toolserver account; TParis has one and may be able to help. 28bytes (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I expect so; although I'd like to move operations onto the toolserver to save my poor little laptop overheating when I have it running. I already have a toolserver account, don't know if you could help me. That way it could run 24/7.
- Are you planning to start it up again at some point? 28bytes (talk) 18:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Do you run it on the computer by itself instead of on toolserver, I meant, but it doesn't matter now. Rcsprinter (deliver) 10:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Rcsprinter123,
You moved the John's Modern Cabins submission to mainspace, however, it wasn't yet ready to be moved to the mainspace as there were existing issues with referencing that needed to be resolved, whilst slapping a maintenance tag is all fine and dandy, that issue would still remain. I hope you understand. Regards, —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:10pm • 12:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Results from comparing Rscprinterbot and 28bot
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that we've finished up the full results for the comparison of your bot and 28bot. To make a long story short: it looks like it's a really good idea to start using a notification to any test editors explaining why there were reverted and how to remedy the situation. For registered editors, anyway. If you want to discuss it more or get some help drafting the message, we'd be happy to. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's great, thanks. Rcsprinter (lecture) 19:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
AfC review
Why did you remove my review of an article at AfC in this edit? My review is the most recent and therefore the most relevant so it is baffling that you removed mine but left an older one in place. SpinningSpark 20:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- It must have just got removed in the confusion. I was trying to clear the big masses of code and put the submission boxes right - removing one in the process, I see! No harm done. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) 20:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!
We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)