User talk:Python2019

Welcome to Python2019's User Talk Page![edit]

Hello, and welcome to my user talk page! My username is Python2019, and I'm an enthusiastic editor and contributor to Wikipedia. My primary interests include history, technology, and various other topics. I'm always looking to expand my knowledge and improve Wikipedia's content.

If you have any questions, suggestions, or concerns about my edits, please feel free to leave a message here. I'm open to constructive criticism and collaboration, as I believe that working together is the key to creating a better and more accurate encyclopedia.

Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (Python2019 (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)), and I'll do my best to respond to your messages in a timely manner.[reply]

Friendly Reminders:

Keep discussions civil and respectful.
Focus on content, not the person.
Assume good faith when interacting with others.
Be patient and open to compromise.

Thank you for stopping by, and happy editing!

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie,

I noticed that my recent changes to the Khangar (community) article were reverted by you. I believe that my changes were valid and backed up by reliable sources.

Could you provide me with more specific feedback on what issues you had with my changes and what steps I can take to improve them? I am open to constructive criticism and feedback and would like to work with you to make sure that the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thanks,

python2019 Python2019 (talk) 13:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were obviously nonneutral, from top to bottom. Did you read the policy link above? MrOllie (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MrOllie,

I believe that my recent changes to the Khangar (community) article were neutral and based on credible sources. You mentioned that my changes were non-neutral, but you did not provide specific examples of what was non-neutral or how it violated Wikipedia's guidelines.

I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines and working with other editors to create high-quality content. Can you please provide me with specific feedback on what issues you had with my changes and how I can improve them?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

python2019 Python2019 (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MrOllie,

I wanted to follow up on my recent changes to the Khangar (community) article. I believe that my changes were neutral and based on credible sources, such as The novel "Gar-kundar" written by Vrindavan Lal Verma .

I understand that you felt my changes were non-neutral, but without specific examples or valid reasons, I cannot understand or address your concerns. I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines for neutrality and verifiability and would appreciate any specific feedback you can offer.

In the meantime, I would like to share some helpful links with you that may provide more information on how to ensure neutrality in Wikipedia articles:

Neutral point of view (NPOV) policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
Verifiability policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
Reliable sources policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources

I am open to discussing how we can work together to improve the article while ensuring it meets Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

python2019 Python2019 (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this you are reverting changes without providing any reference and without valid reasons.

Hello @MrOllie, thank you for your response regarding the changes I made to the Khangar (community) page. I have reviewed the content and believe it adheres to the NPOV policy and provides well-referenced information to improve the article's quality.

I understand that we may have differing opinions on this matter, and I am open to collaboration and discussion to resolve any concerns. If we are unable to reach an agreement, I propose that we seek community input on the article's talk page or bring this matter to the [Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard) to gain a broader perspective and find a solution that adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines.

I look forward to working together to enhance the article and maintain the high standards of Wikipedia. Thank you. Python2019 (talk) 06:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to add unreferenced content using non-neutral language while removing cited content and maintenance templates. Please don't do this. ... discospinster _talk 00:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Discospinster,

I respectfully disagree with your assessment. The content I added is well-referenced and adheres to a neutral point of view. If you have specific concerns, I kindly request that you point them out so that we can address them together.

Please be aware that engaging in edit warring is not constructive for the Wikipedia community and violates edit warring policy. If we are unable to reach a consensus, we can consider raising this issue at the dispute resolution noticeboard to seek a neutral third party's input.

I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines and avoid further edit warring. Let's work together towards a constructive resolution.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

Best regards, Python2019‬ Python2019 (talk) 01:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. ... discospinster _talk 01:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Despite the challenges, his rule was marked by prosperity and stability in the region, and his kingdom was known for its cultural and artistic achievements." This is uncited and not neutrally worded.

"They have made significant contributions to various fields, including politics, arts, and sports, and they continue to inspire generations with their bravery, resilience, and commitment to their heritage." This is uncited and not neutrally worded.

"Their bravery and sacrifice in defending their kingdom against external threats will always be remembered, and their legacy will continue to inspire future generations." This is uncited and definitely not neutrally worded. ... discospinster _talk 01:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Discospinster,

Thank you for pointing out the specific sections that you believe are not well-cited or neutrally-worded. I appreciate your constructive feedback and would like to work together to improve the article. I will revise the mentioned sections to better align with Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality and sourcing.

However, I would like to remind you that the threat of blocking another editor without engaging in a proper discussion first can be seen as contrary to the collaborative nature of Wikipedia. I am committed to working together to improve the article and encourage open communication.

Once I have revised the mentioned sections, I kindly ask you to review the changes and provide further feedback if necessary.

Best regards, Python2019‬ Python2019 (talk) 01:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are "committed to working together", I trust we will see you engaging in discussion, at the article's talk pages or user talk pages, rather than continuing to try to edit war the material into articles. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage you to review and modify the content as needed, rather than reverting to a previous version. Engaging in constructive dialogue and collaboration on the article's talk page or user talk pages will benefit the Wikipedia community and ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the content. Thank you for your understanding. Python2019 (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will do neither. I became aware of the situation at the article while reviewing recent changes (as well as seeing your comments on User talk:Discospinster, which is on my watchlist), and I am acting in my capacity as an administrator, not as an editor. —C.Fred (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]