User talk:Publicspeaker2020

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav edke (October 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 15:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Publicspeaker2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 15:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav edke (October 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vaibhav edke has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vaibhav edke. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav edke (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaibhav edke (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 12:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice[edit]

Information icon Hello, Publicspeaker2020. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 14:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 14:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gerald Waldo Luis was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeraldWL 15:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Snowycats was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Snowycats (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Publicspeaker2020! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Regarding the draft maharashtra students welfare association, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Maharashtra Students Welfare Association, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Maharashtra Students Welfare Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Maharashtra Students Welfare Association during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Note: The actual discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharashtra Students Welfare Association. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 14:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Lad has been accepted[edit]

Arun Lad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft articles and PROD[edit]

WP:Proposed deletion cannot be used for drafts:

PROD is only applicable to mainspace articles, lists, set indices, disambiguation pages, and files not on Commons. Books may also be proposed for deletion, using a similar process. Proposed deletion cannot be used with redirects, user pages (except user books), drafts, templates, categories, or pages in any other namespace.

Please use WP:Miscellany for deletion instead. By and large, rejected drafts that are nominated at MFD are NOT deleted unless there is a compelling reason to do so. "This topic is unlikely to be notable any time soon" is typically not considered a good enough reason. If you do nothing, the draft will be deleted 6 months after its last edit by a human being under WP:CSD#G13 "Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions."

By the way, when you do use "proposed deletion" in an actual, non-draft article, please use the |concern= parameter to let other editors know WHY you think it should be deleted. This will make it less likely that your "PROD" will be removed. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 19:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gautami Deshpande (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 11:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gautami Deshpande (January 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Synoman Barris was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 16:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Srishti Goswami (January 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gautami Deshpande (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vaibhavedke per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vaibhavedke. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]