User talk:Psykostevo

Three Sheets[edit]

Your edits here are being reverted because, although it is good quality writing, it's not encyclopedic in tone. Phrases like "the show is as entertaining as it is educational" and "this show is the ultimate drinking show" are written in a promotional style, and don't meet wikipedia's WP:NPOV. In addition, your writing doesn't provide any references, so it's disallowed as original research. If you'll read up on the wikipedia guidelines above, I'm sure you can tailor the edits to properly meet the standards. Thanks! Snowfire51 (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Sorry about that. It's just very unusual to find a relatively new editor add so much well written text without it being copied from somewhere. My apologies about assuming the worse. I do tend to agree with Snowfire51 that some of the text might not be of the correct style for here. Articles here tend to be of a more formal tone. For example, your pun, while funny, might not work so well. I am glad that you expanded the article. It needed some expansion. I like the show, too. Needs more Pleepleus. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Delirium Tremens (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Delirium Tremens (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: americanlivewire.com (December 13)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/americanlivewire.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Psykostevo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/americanlivewire.com concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/americanlivewire.com, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/americanlivewire.com[edit]

Hello Psykostevo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "americanlivewire.com".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/americanlivewire.com}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Cruise & Excursions, Inc. (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Cruise & Excursions, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 22:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sears Vacations for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sears Vacations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sears Vacations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mb66w 02:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Pontiac Solstice because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]