User talk:Prince.Hanzra

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Prince.Hanzra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Moosetape, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Remember, with your declared COI, you must cite reliable sources. Really, you shouldn't edit the article at all; instead, you should request changes at the article's talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The content is fully reliable Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its based on true things Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it's reliable, then you should have no issue providing evidence where independent sources have published it. —C.Fred (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm beginner and don't know how to provide it

Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sidhu moose wala official instagram post is its evidence

Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SPS for why the artist's Instagram is of limited reliability. —C.Fred (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I'm his close friend and even every i dian know this Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mena every indian know these things that i have changed in the data Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dude everyone who follow him knows that stuff it's isn't wrong in any way Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand it took me 3 hours to edit all this and you had reset all in just one click, what about my time and work and above all this you have changed the correct info i had edited Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia. The edits you made to the article are unverifiable; that's why they were removed. —C.Fred (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then tell me what you need for evidence Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Published independent secondary sources, as described in WP:Reliable sources. As a general rule, that's magazine articles, newspaper stories, and the like. —C.Fred (talk) 21:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For your kind information your page about moosetape is giving wrong info and if i had corrected all those mistake why you reset it ???.....how I'll tell you that all those changes were reliable and accurate Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did not cite any sources. I'm not sure how to make it any clearer: you cannot edit Wikipedia based on what you (claim to) know. You must cite independent, reliable sources. This is especially true when you have a connection to the subject.

If these guidelines are still unclear, perhaps you should focus on articles unrelated to Moose Wala while you are learning. —C.Fred (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me your personal whatsapp no. I'll send you pics there Please i wanna make it clear I'm not a programmer so didn't know it....ordering the things is my passion please

Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. Wikipedia-related discussions should take place on Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 21:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll send you link you can see the post of songs which were not even mentioned .....and youtube video where those 3 4 producers of song are too not mentioned Prince.Hanzra (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is the link to a trade magazine that talks about them being released as singles? —C.Fred (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No they are link to instagram post of tracks and a youtube link of Celebrity killer sobg in which 6 producer are there but 3 aren't mentioned in your page Prince.Hanzra (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An Instagram post of tracks is probably not acceptable. (The exception would be if it came from a verified account.) The reliability of the YouTube link depends on the publisher—and if the publisher is verified. —C.Fred (talk) 01:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its a verified account on insta as well as the youtube channel Prince.Hanzra (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Battle of Chamkaur.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Chamkaur.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 07:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Greater India or Ancient India.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Greater India or Ancient India.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Akhand Bharat, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 17:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 19:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Akhand Bharat, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 23:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Harbaksh Singh.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Harbaksh Singh.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Harbaksh Singh.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Harbaksh Singh.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.amarujala.com/news-archives/india-news-archives/general-harbaksh-singh-in-1965-war-with-pakistan-hindi-news-dk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Submarine-launched ballistic missile. Mako001 (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong in it Prince.Hanzra (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had organised the tabular form in better way but didn't make anything wrong in it you can check Prince.Hanzra (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Smt. Draupadi Murmu.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Smt. Draupadi Murmu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Draupadi Murmu gov.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Draupadi Murmu gov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]