User talk:Prajnaana

Welcome!

Hello, Prajnaana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Bangalore Cantonment have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type {{helpme}} on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Abhishek ^Talk 06:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hampi, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Devarayanadurga. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Prajnaana. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script[edit]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Mysore, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Thank you. Prajnaana (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

I have removed original research from Devīsūkta, since it seemed to be your own original synthesis, which is not allowed. Also it seemed to be promotional in tone. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 20:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my own synthesis. It's taken from a printed book published by the administration of an erstwhile kingdom, and the source of which was cited. And along with the so called 'my synthesis', you've removed the 6000-year-old Sanskrit text which is nobody's synthesis.

The article is now a meaningless, incomplete orphan. Prajnaana (talk) 09:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional? Promoting whom? A dead king? 😅 Prajnaana (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]