User talk:PopperPeachesCoconut2022

March 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Lion Guard have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Lion Guard was changed by PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854286 on 2022-03-13T23:02:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Lion Guard. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 23:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But i'm just expressing my opinion. PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PopperPeachesCoconut2022—Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view, and "opinions" should be asserted with a reliable source. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 23:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your political beliefs are liberal. PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 23:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well. People have opinions; I get it. However, we should not bring these opinions to Wikipedia articles, and opinions can very well be placed somewhere else. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 23:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but can you accept that I don't like lion guard? PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 23:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely! I absolutely am not against you disliking The Lion Guard, in fact, hate it all you want! Just make sure not to let that slither its way into Wikipedia articles, as it may promote bias. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 23:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like it? PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 01:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me personally, I'm indifferent. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 02:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 01:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of The Lion Guard episodes, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 02:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of The Lion King (franchise) characters. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 02:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But I don't like Lion Kig. PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 02:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Lion King (franchise) characters, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of The Lion King (franchise) characters was changed by PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959711 on 2022-03-18T03:14:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 08:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When can I be unblocked? PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PopperPeachesCoconut2022—If you return, I would suggest taking the standard offer. However, if you have other valid reasons, you may appeal here by placing{{unblock|reason=(insert reason here)}}, or by appealing via UTRS. Also, note that if you do take the standard offer, you would effectively convert this indefblock into a ban that can only be appealed via WP:AN. Finally, if you do appeal in the first place, make sure you read the guide to appealing blocks first, and do it carefully. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 03:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=There are many edits on here that should be fixed. I want to try and help fix them. Please unblock me. PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=There are many edits on here that I think should be fixed. I want to help fix them, but I am blocked. Can I please be unblocked?PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 00:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not place multiple unblock requests at once. If you are clueless as to how it does not show up, your templates are incomplete. Close them by putting two curly braces {{ before the front, and then close it again by putting two curly braces after the template }}, so it should appear like this: {{unblock|reason=(insert your reason here)}}. I would advise that you retract one or more of your multiple unblock requests as that is more likely to be declined. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 02:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There are many edits on here that I think should be fixed. I want to help fix them, but I am blocked. Can I please be unblocked?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{tlx|unblock|reason= I need to fix some edits

There are many edits on here that I think should be fixed. I want to help fix them, but I am blocked. Can I please be unblocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PopperPeachesCoconut2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and ::will make useful contributions instead. ::

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 09:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PopperPeachesCoconut2022. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]