User talk:Ponderosa Templeton

Welcome!

Hello, Ponderosa Templeton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Megan Wilson. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please note that copyright is automatic when something is published, even if it's published online, or as a student paper, or whatever. Text on wikipedia should be either original or properly licensed. See wp:copyright for details. The same applies to images, by the way. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MeganWilson 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MeganWilson 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

I've looked at this again, and although you gave no references, a couple of the external links actually give an indication that she may be too notable for speedy deletion, although she could still be nominated for WP:AfD. I've therefore restored the article and created a references section. I've reorganised the external links, and removed spam links to commercial sites like Amazon. If this article is tagged again, you should not remove the tag yourself, there is a filter that checks for that; better to consult the tagger.

The image is at risk unless you give a source, and may not be usable even if it's your own photo. I've an idea that US copyright law prevents the free use of photos of objects that are not two-dimensional (ie paintings), but I'm a Brit, so don't rely on my thoughts. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MeganWilson 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MeganWilson 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Clarion Alley Mural Project, Mission District, San Francisco.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clarion Alley Mural Project, Mission District, San Francisco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{Help me}} I don't understand why this file was deleted - I took the photograph - there is no copyright - and it is a free file - anyone can use it.

Possibly unfree File:Clarion Alley Mural Project, Mission District.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clarion Alley Mural Project, Mission District.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ponderosa Templeton. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ponderosa Templeton. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jessica-Miller 1.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jessica-Miller 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 07:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

I undid your edits to Mission District, San Francisco as you restored an image file that did not exist and removed the interlanguage link to the Nederlands site which was valid. Please be careful to check your work. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:"Wall of Shame & Solutions" by artists Christopher Statton, Megan Wilson, and Mike Reger on Clarion Alley, San Francisco.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:"Wall of Shame & Solutions" by artists Christopher Statton, Megan Wilson, and Mike Reger on Clarion Alley, San Francisco.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 00:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Statton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Statton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Megan Wilson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Billings and Stephen Elliott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ponderosa Templeton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Megan Wilson. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ponderosa Templeton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]