User talk:Plamsome

Your uploaded images

Hello and thank you for adding new information about newer described earliest fish. I want to know is that should your uploaded images be actual your work.[1][2] Especially for Fanjingshania, I can see same image in this article,[3] so it is possible that will be deleted. I feel the need to clarify if these are actually your own images. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 13:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

The images of Qianodus and Fanjingshania are from my research (I am the lead author of the papers describing the two taxa). I wrote the EurekAlert! article and provided the Fanjingshania image you are referring to. If this is an issue I can substitute it with a different render. The Qianodus tooth whorl render is different from the holotype illustrations that appear in the Nature paper and to the best of my knowledge it is available only on Wikipedia. Please let me know if you require further details.

Cheers

Plamen Plamsome (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying! Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

By the way, I was curious, why are you only adding information about Fanjingshania and Qianodus? I have not seen you add information about Xiushanosteus and Shenacanthus, important discoveries that were described at the same time and which I believe may be relevant to your research. I think information and images for these taxa are helpful as well, alongside galeaspid Tujiaaspis. About "Recognition" you added to article Guizhou, I think that shouldn't be added because there are too many taxon named after Guizhou, like Guizhouichthyosaurus, Keichousaurus, Birgeria guizhouensis etc. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

My understanding is that my colleagues who described Xiushanosteus and Shenacanthus will provide the relevant information and images for Wikipedia.

As far as my Guizhou article entry is concerned, I thought Qianodus is a worthy mention as the oldest toothed vertebrate, potentially being included in the upcoming Guinness World Records book. I am happy to remove the mention if you consider it to be out of place there.

Cheers

Plamen Plamsome (talk) 11:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qianodus (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Qianodus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Plamsome! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Qianodus moved to mainspace

Hi, I've gone and cleaned up the draft and moved it to the main wikipedia article area, see Qianodus. Sorry for the long delay, the draft system is often backlogged. Many thanks for contributing. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)