User talk:Pitts0608

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assignments #1 and #2[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! It looks like you've successfully completed the first two assignments! The third -- handed out last Monday -- is to identify several Wikipedia articles specifically on electrochemistry topics that need improvement, and describe what needs to be improved on my talk page. -- Sethant (talk) 06:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #3[edit]

Howdy! Looks like you've gotten Wikipedia assignment #3 completed successfully! -- Sethant (talk) 00:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #5[edit]

Review for assignment #5[edit]

Howdy! For your first review for Wikipedia assignment #5, check out the proposed edits made at User:Kaleb.LT/sandbox and leave a comment about something you like and something you think they could improve further! - Sethant (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #4 done![edit]

Looks like you've gotten assignment #4 done! Expect a review or two from your peers soon! -- Sethant (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review on Revision[edit]

Hello! Nice job on the revision! It is much more clear and is definitely easier to follow when compared to the previous section. However, I am not sure why the first paragraph is bolded as it adds unneeded emphasis on this section. I think if you would like to emphasis a given point in the paragraph bold a word or phrase instead of the whole paragraph. Altogether, awesome job! :) Kristagoit (talk) 03:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed the viewing of Kaleb's proposal and it looks really good. I did say that it might be helpful to provide some links to his revision. Other than that I looked good. Thanks Seth for everything. I leave this Monday for training and then I will be moving to Wilson-ville after that so I won't be seeing you any more. Have a great summer and thank you again.

Assignment #5[edit]

Looks like you completed your review for Wikipedia assignment #5! I've recorded it! Thanks! - Sethant (talk) 03:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Pitts0608, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hello Pitts0608. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "electrolysis".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/electrolysis}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 19:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]