User talk:Picantho
| This user is a student editor in Simmons_University_School_of_Library_and_Information_Science/Information_Policy_(Spring_2023) . |
Picantho, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Picantho! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC) |
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Picantho, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Usage Notice[edit]
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Thomas Jefferson, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Askedonty (talk) 09:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Usage Notice[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Market share , has been reverted. Downgrading is a cascading issue regarding the maintenance of the article you are linking to. You may find it helpful to look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Askedonty (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas[edit]
Hello Picantho: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
'estimated at about ... '[edit]
Hi! You've removed several instances of 'estimated at about' from text that I've written. In each case I believe you were wrong to do so. In this case my text read "... estimated at about 3.4 million ...". The actual estimate given in the source is 3394791, but that is ridiculously over-precise, so I have rounded it to 3400000 – and made clear that I've done so by prefixing that number with 'about'. Do you have a suggestion as to how this could be improved or handled better? Or would you perhaps stop making edits of this kind in cases where the figure in the article is an approximation to the actual number given in the source? Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Justlettersandnumbers — thanks for your note. The concept of approximation or rough calculation is implied within the term "estimated," so "about," "around," "approximately," "roughly," etc. are not needed as qualifiers. These phrases are included in WP:AWB's list, in the "remove redundant words" (WP:TERSE) section. I understand the figures you have included are rounded from more precise numbers within sources, though "estimated at" covers both 3394791 and 3.4 million, e.g., as approximations/rough calculations. "Calculated around" or "quantified around" could use these qualifies, as they imply more precision, but "estimated at around" and "estimated at" in these instances act synonymously. Thanks — Picantho (talk) 23:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to James Webb Space Telescope, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Stromness Lifeboat Station[edit]
Thanks for your contribution to Stromness Lifeboat Station.
I just wanted to point out that using the expression 'Lives were lost' is a regular and expected term to be used in Shipping disasters, is not a Euphamism, and is perfectly acceptable. MartinOjsyork (talk) 18:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)