User talk:Picallin

This is Picallin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingston, Glasgow (January 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tradeston instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingston, Glasgow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingston, Glasgow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 18:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Picallin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 18:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingston, Glasgow (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cesdeva was:

Please add additional reliable sources WP:RS to verify the existence of this district.

It's not clear whether Kingston is currently a district.

Glasgow City Council seems to use the term 'Ibrox/Kingston neighbourhood' as an administrative grouping. Which may suggest that Kingston doesn't carry district status anymore.

You could possibly write about 'Kingston district' in a historical sense. Providing the topic meets notability guidelines.

Thanks for your submission. Please re-submit when you feel you have addressed these concerns. Cesdeva ^(talk) 22:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingston, Glasgow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingston, Glasgow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cesdeva ^(talk) 22:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kingston, Glasgow has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kingston, Glasgow. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kingston, Glasgow has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kingston, Glasgow. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingston, Glasgow (February 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Govan (ward). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See my comments. A separate article may be in order, but we should resolve this by discussion, not by a submit-decline-resubmit (SDR) cycle.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingston, Glasgow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingston, Glasgow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since every other district of Glasgow seems to have its own Wiki entry (and Kingston has been missed for some reason) then surely as a minimum a Kingston article should be there as a place-holder for someone else to add to as and when. I've started it, but I don't necessarily want to research further until time (or retirement) allows.

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Kingston and surrounding areas.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kingston and surrounding areas.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kingston and surrounding areas.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kingston and surrounding areas.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CC BY SA template[edit]

Hi, why did you make this edit?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Cc-by-sa-4.0/doc&diff=883744250&oldid=859017666&diffmode=visual

It's the 4.0 template, but you changed it to say 2.0 in the documentation? I think it should say 4.0:

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.

This template should only be used on file pages.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
Attribution: attribution requirement goes here

This template should only be used on file pages.

— Omegatron (talk) 05:31, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]