User talk:Pedro158

March 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Indigenous peoples of Mexico have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Indigenous peoples of Mexico was changed by Pedro158 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895628 on 2021-03-14T08:58:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CMD (talk) 05:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Philippines for a period of one week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 13:17, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pedro158 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sysop "ToBeFree‬" is blocked me arguing "I made a retaliation" because I report this edit warrior in ANI, please, fix it urgently. This needs to be attached to an Arbitration Committee report. Sysop also manipulated that report. In the other hand, another involved sysop, an user named "C.Fred", is hidding his talk page because evidences. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Nothing is stopping you from filing an arbitration committee report. Nothing in this unblock request convinces me you should have your partial block lifted. Yamla (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Warning[edit]

In my opinion you have been treated very leniently. For my part I'm tempted to block you from the entire site for your persistent attacks and assumptions of bad faith. The stuff about C.Fred above is laughable. This is supposed to be a collaborative project. You need to start listening to more experienced users and stop attacking everybody who tries to advise you or explain anything to you. If you don't, I will block you. Bishonen | tålk 20:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

April 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ched (talk) 21:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pedro158 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, User:Ched was blocked me without expiry without reason.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Janitor102, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

(CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]