User talk:Party/Archives2008/February

RE: Hello!

As of now, I manually patrol the new pages log through its special page. Do you have any recommendations as to which tools, if any, make new page patrolling less tedious? » AIAN ANDREJI BINLAYO ^(T/C) 22:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:Protection

The link doesn't seem to be working. I'd try email. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 00:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PartyBOT

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PartyBOT, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PartyBOT and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PartyBOT during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Party!^{Talk to me!} 01:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I was just trying to welcome that new user to wikipedia and give them some helpful links Smart Guy (talk) 21:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:HellO!

I apologize! :) I could customize your user talk page if you want :) I can make it look better if you want :) --Party!^{Talk to me!} 21:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks but no thanks

Thank you for your offer to customize my user page but I already have another user helping me with that;) Smart Guy (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Recent Change Patrol

I go click on the recent changes link under the interaction heading on the left side of the main pages and manually review recent changes

you can also go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Recent_changes_patrol for more details

Reverted edit to Taser

Hi, you reverted an edit of mine, leaving a template message that described it as "unconstructive". Could you explain your reasoning? Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 21:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response. Happy editing! Flatscan (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean by this

What do you mean by the below message?

Sorry! I tagged it as vandalism! But don't worry! You can copy off my monobook.js to find Friendly tags wich are the proper ones :) Sorry! --Party!Talk to me! 21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Smart Guy (talk) 21:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

re: re: What do you mean by this

why would i want to do that instead f just copying and pasting the template???? Smart Guy (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Scripts

Oh I understand, Thanks for the help but I think i need to learn a little more about Wikipedia and HTML and .css and .js and all that stuff before I try any of that fancy stuff;)

Smart Guy (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks For Friendly

I just added the code you recommended to me you were right it is much quicker that copying and pasting thanks:) Smart Guy (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Military of Belgium Russian presidential election, 2008 Officer, Victoria Beaconsfield, Victoria Interstate 19 De La Concorde (Montreal Metro) Beaconsfield–Baie-D'Urfé Ladin Political endorsement Beaconsfield railway station, Melbourne Military of the Netherlands Narre Warren North, Victoria Military of Croatia Interstate 69 Beaconsfield, New South Wales Royal Titles Act 1876 Beaconsfield, Western Australia Shire of Cardinia Spanish Armed Forces

Cleanup George Hodges Knox United Aircraft and Transport Corporation Mullingar Merge Zagal - Zagreb Airlines Military of Hungary Sacking out Add Sources Primrose Day Leeuwarden Military of the Republic of Macedonia Wikify Frederick Gardiner Transport in Singapore European Community Expand Longueuil, Quebec Rest area De Stijl

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I confirm that my freenode nick is party

I confirm that my freenode nick is party. --Party!^{Talk to me!} 22:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Mexican Peso

The edit was not unconstructive, there is a current attempt to make the article better which Dove1950 continually is hindering by reverting to his version of the article, other editors of the page, and myself have been discussing the matter and the version I reverted to represents the current agreed upon version. -- Jolliette Alice Bessette, -- 22:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ce n'est pas un problème :) Parlez-vous français? -- Jolliette Alice Bessette, -- 23:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Hé oui! tout comme vous, je détiens la double nationalité Américaine et Canadienne, mais chus plutôt de tendance séparatiste :P --Party!^{Talk to me!} 23:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to HD DVD. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Ray andrew (talk) 13:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 6	4 February 2008	About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV	Tensions in journalistic use of Wikipedia explored
Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Adding citations
Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Project Chanology

Please don't nominate this as an WP:FAC yet, it's way way too early for that. Cirt (talk) 22:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I noticed you have not added Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Project Chanology to the WP:FAC page yet, please don't. It's way too early for that, and it will most likely not be promoted. Cirt (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

You could simply withdraw the FAC nomination by placing {{db-author}} at the top of the nomination page, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Project Chanology. Cirt (talk) 22:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Cirt (talk) 01:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Salting

Yeah, I know about salting. I just figured it'd be more productive to warn him directly so that he'll stop. Although it probably still won't work...*twiddle* Gromlakh (talk) 01:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm using Twinkle and navigation popups. Gromlakh (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I invite you to try Huggle wich can be found at WP:Huggle. --Party!^{Talk to me!} 01:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for your revert of the food science article yesterday. I really appreciate it. Chris (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Psychosurgery

How is this vandalism? I feel you are inappropriately reverting my corrections to this article. 205.175.121.90 (talk) 22:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I sympathise mate, apparently this is vandalism too: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chesterfield&diff=189636063&oldid=189483259

Over-zealous would be an understatement... For the record I wrote half of that bloody article so he can go sod off... the edit is back by the way, with some improvements: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chesterfield&diff=189637113&oldid=189636086 . Party even vandalised the HD DVD article, look at the top of this chat (as of 09 Feb 08), he removed perfectly good additions again!

I guess relevant information with a reference is even worse vandalism... how long before you revert it Party? I guess this message will be removed too, as vandalism to a userpage ^o) 150.237.47.51 (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tramzone6.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tramzone6.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback warning

Warning - the use of rollback in situations other than clear vandalism reverts may result in the privilege being withdrawn from your account. Stifle (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tramzone6.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Tramzone6.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stifle (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

You tagged a picture wich i asked a admin to restore, and i gave it the proper tag, it is ineed a bus pass, wich obiviously you don't know how one looks like. So i reverted it. It is ineed a bus pass. It's public domain... The design doesn't come back for a while. --Party!^{Talk to me!} 15:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you understand the meaning of the words "public domain", and I do think I know what a bus pass looks like. An image is in the public domain if it can be used by anyone and is not subject to copyright. This image is certainly not in the public domain - it is copyrighted by the Agence métropolitaine de transport. Therefore, you must follow the non-free content criteria in order to use it. Do not just revert and put a public domain tag on it, as otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Stifle (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

There has been a update on the Image:Tramzone6.png. The AMT declares it as public domain. I have contacted the issuer and they replied. I forwarded it to permissions@wikimedia.org... --Party!^{Talk to me!} 19:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I think it needs to be permissions-en@wikimedia.org (or permissions-fr@wikimedia.org if it's in French). Once the folks there have checked it all out they'll tag the image correctly. Thanks for securing a free image for Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The permission hasn't been accepted. Please contact User:Bapti to discuss the matter. Stifle (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 7	11 February 2008	About the Signpost

Petition seeks to remove images of Muhammad	Foundation's FY2007 audit released
Vatican claims out-of-context Wikipedia quote was used to attack Pope	Best of WikiWorld: "W"
News and notes: Working group, Wik-iPhone, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Tutorial: Basic dispute resolution	Dispatches: Great saves at Featured article review
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB

Thanks a lot for the update!!! LeaveSleaves (talk) 03:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

Today, i went to the AMT offices in Montréal and spoke to a legal representative. she told me that Tramzone6.png is under a full public licence or GFDL. She asked that i must secure the image, so i'll watermark it with the word SAMPLE. --Party!^{Talk to me!} 23:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Watermarking isn't allowed for free images, although you can put the text VOID or SAMPLE across it. Stifle (talk) 09:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

And you must STILL get the permission sent through to Wikimedia properly. Stifle (talk) 09:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

As you have once again removed the license warning tag without taking steps to obtain a proper license, I have no other alternative than to list the image on WP:PUI and make a report at WP:AN. Stifle (talk) 10:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Cattle Feed Rollback

Hello, I made an edit to the "Antibiotics" section of the Cattle Feed article which you rolled back, leaving the following message:

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cattle feeding has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Party!Talk to me! 22:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why you deemed it "unconstructive"? I did test it before posting, confirmed that my links and references worked, and provided an edit summary with the change. My addition was also highly relevant to the topic. Please provide me with more feedback as to what I did wrong, or undo the rollback. Thanks. --24.34.45.104 (talk) 23:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reversion

Thanks for reverting the sock's blanking of my talk page. Didn't realise immediately as I was editing another page right then. Cheers! CounterFX (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip :-) I was considering setting up some form of archiving eventually, so I'll keep your post in mind. CounterFX (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Toyota edit not vandalism

My toyota edit was not a vandalism. I was splitting that article into toyota motorsports. Can you revert your change and leave mine? Thanks. 71.229.195.124 (talk) 20:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: AWB

I want to use it to more easily insert templates and tags into pages without using a bot and getting a paranoia-induced illegal-sockpuppetteer label and banned indefinitely. CJ Miller. (^{That's my name.}_{Don't wear it out.}) 23:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHU

I just saw your comment at the request for changing usernames. Just to let you know that the request was not completed because it had the potential to offend users, so you've got nothing to worry about. Cheers —αlεx•mullεr 07:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi!

(Moving thread here) CounterFX (talk) 11:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

It's me again! LOL!

Just went trough a few things and i noticed that you requested a username ursupation... When i started using Wikipedia, i was on FadedSoul then ursuped Party but a editor was opposed to it due to my user being new and the 'crat went forward and changed it for me. :) --Party!^{Talk to me!} 04:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info! I hope you don't mind me moving this thread here, but I would prefer not having the usurpation mentioned on my talk page (or talk page archives). I had to change my original usurpation request after a user pointed out a potential conflict with another editor on the Italian Wikipedia having ~9000 edits (didn't want to risk having to change again when the unified login is enacted – if ever). Re usurpation: I am intending to update my signatures on (active) article talk pages to which I have contributed, do you know whether it is acceptable to do the same for archived talk pages and user talk pages? Please reply here, I'm watching you too :-p CounterFX (talk) 11:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AntiHomophobe

I think that "too many userboxes" is bad reason, but - just for you - I moved them to a sub-page. --AntiHomophobe (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Defamation

in future do not reprt me as a vandal for removing a copyright violation or false and unreferenced information or these matters will be reported as it is against Wikipedia guidelines and is also defamation of character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benv-b92 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:WP:AWB

I guess so. If you see a user with less than 500 edits that does not explain a reason for wanting AWB, I don't see a problem with removing them.   jj137 (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party/Archives2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[[:SAFESUBST:#switch:
 
 user talk]]

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:Amrhingar

see User_talk:Amrhingar#WP:AWB --Amrhingar (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of Template:Userlinks. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Unblock reviewed

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, given his disruptive behaviour on this page, I do not believe he has Wikipedia's best intentions at heart. --Deskana (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I have disabled the use of the Emailuser function on this account. Please do not e-mail other bureaucrats trying to get them to rename you. You are blocked, you are not allowed to edit. --Deskana (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)