User talk:P2prules

Welcome[edit]

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, P2prules, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 12:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VENENUX GNU/Linux[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on VENENUX GNU/Linux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ahunt (talk) 13:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Affective videogames[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Affective videogames, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Affective videogame. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Affective games[edit]

Category:Affective games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Affection video games[edit]

Category:Affection video games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping Wikipedia Expanding Not Shrinking[edit]

Delete canvassing bullshit. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 04:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:P2prules sorry for disturbing you. The reason I am writing you is we all love Wikipedia and we want it expanding. However there is a discussion going on to delete a notable game article because of biased opinions. I saw that you edited this article: Critical_Gameplay and let it stay for further expansion, update and keep growing Wikipedia. But I am also totally agree with you to let articles stay for improvements and expand Wikipedia. So I believe you are a neutral, professional, objective and who believes in expanding Wikipedia not shrinking it type of person. So I would like you to check out this discussion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MonsterMMORPG_(2nd_nomination) and make your comment based on references it has. References are here Talk:MonsterMMORPG. Please feel free to delete my message to you after you read it. Thank you very much have a nice day.176.233.41.152 (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Affectivity and Category:Affection games[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Affectivity and Category:Affection games requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

It would have been appreciated if you had replied at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 April 3#Category:Affective games as to which of your many newly created categories you thought were most worth keeping. – Fayenatic London 17:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now Category:Affectivity by medium is up for deletion as empty. – Fayenatic London 15:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (High life (biology)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating High life (biology), P2prules!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I redirected your stub into an existing article on the same subject. Feel free to expand the article Aeroplankton with reliable sources. Cheers,

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Women in computing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OS, Adele Goldberg and Mark I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Andy Warhol artworks[edit]

The article List of Andy Warhol artworks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article about Andy Warhol has much more details, as well as there is an independent Warhol filmography article. This article in it's current form is a mess - it states to be List of Warhol paintings, while it's called List of artworks and it contains just some paintings and films. Hence, I propose to delete it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Assassination of John F. Kennedy, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Legion fi (talk) 20:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Assassination of John F. Kennedy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Legion fi (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of numbers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silver Spring Library, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scan, Montgomery County and Cents. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of American books in the public domain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Relativity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elaine de Kooning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Egan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Latino diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Public domain films[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Public domain films. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of films in the public domain in the United States. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of films in the public domain in the United States – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 02:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you were trying to create an article specifically about public domain films, however it looks like there is already an article about this at Public domain film. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 in public domain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Public domain films has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Public domain films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. GreenC 20:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of films in the public domain in the United States

added links pointing to Conspiracy, Body and Soul, The Stranger, Charade, Rock, Rock, Rock and White Zombie

Comprehensive sex education

added a link pointing to Comprehensive

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Migration from Latin America to Europe[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Migration from Latin America to Europe, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Basic income in the United States[edit]

Hello P2prules,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Basic income in the United States for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 08:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alaska Permanent Fund into Basic income in the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 12:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again: There were edits on 24 September that were picked up by a bot, instances where you did not add the attribution as required by the CC-by-SA license. Failing to provide this legally required attribution is a copyright violation. It is a serious concern, and you need to start doing it right away. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public domain book, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Emma and Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Hatred for hispanics[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hatred for hispanics. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hispanophobia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hispanophobia – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Savonneux (talk) 03:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Positive culture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Positive culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savonneux (talk) 03:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Public domain book for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public domain book is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public domain book until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hairy Dude (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Public domain

added links pointing to Shirley, Mathilda, Camilla (novel), Villette, Emma, The Professor and Vanity Fair

Right to science and culture

added a link pointing to Preserve

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Basic income in the United States

added links pointing to Equality, Panhandling, Jobs and Standing up

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poverty[edit]

It might be the case that the material you added to Poverty was a useful addition to the article. I didn't check to see if it was. My main reason for undoing your edit is that when copying material within Wikipedia it must be done in a particular way to properly credit all contributors.--S Philbrick (Talk) 15:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for the proper way to copy material within Wikipedia.

Additions to See Also sections[edit]

Hello! You may not be aware that adding links to "see also" sections to terms that already occur in the article text is against the Manual of Style, as are excessively long "see also" sections in general. You've been adding lots of "see also" links to various articles, and the rapid-fire rate of some edits (such as these three: [1], [2], [3]) suggests that you aren't examining the article text first. Take care to ensure links are relevant, aren't duplicated, and can't be easily integrated into the article text, before adding them to "see also" sections. Thanks! ʍ w 21:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And... again. The first link you added duplicates the very first link in the article, plus there are several other duplicated terms already in the article which can and should be linked in the article, rather than the see also. Edits that oppose the MOS are usually considered disruptive; I suggest you stop. ʍ w 04:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mordecai Wyatt Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Assassination. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masterminds. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arts and culture of Washington, D.C.

added a link pointing to WMAL

Culture of Washington, D.C.

added a link pointing to WMAL

Theatre in Washington, D.C.

added a link pointing to Tivoli Theater

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down[edit]

All you're doing of late is adding original research or badly sourced text (neither The Daily Maill or Wiktionary are reliable sources on Wikipedia), or tangentially related see also entries, to long-standing, stable Wikipedia articles. This is not helpful in the least. Other problems with your editing include your lack of edit summaries and the speed of it, creating lots of work for editors to clean your edits up. For that reason, I've reverted many of your recent edits. I think you'd be better off editing in your native language Wikipedia. Graham87 06:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catholic University of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Total. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyparchia, Apuleius and public sex.[edit]

I have reverted your edits in Feminism (twice), Protofeminism, History of Feminism and Public sex. I have started a discussion in Talk:Feminism and since all the reverted edits have the same problem, I think it's best to discuss it in one place: Talk:Feminism. Also I have checked the Florida by Apuleius and the only mention of Hyparchia is her marrying Crates the Cynic. No mention of any public sex or other saucy details. I am eagerly awaiting your comments. Kleuske (talk) 19:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Howard University Libraries for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howard University Libraries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard University Libraries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 02:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the United States federal budget page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of corporations in the United States[edit]

Hello P2prules,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of corporations in the United States for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Category:Business organizations in the United States.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prmcd16 (talk) 04:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of corporations in the United States for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of corporations in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of corporations in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CapitalSasha ~ talk 22:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, P2prules. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, P2prules. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from John F. Kennedy into Foreign policy of the John F. Kennedy administration. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source Soliciting and Copying across wikipedia without attribution and bad English[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Many articles, you may be blocked from editing. See "Source soliciting" in this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming You can not say "all Ministry of Culture (type) articles can be expanded using my source" but that is exactly what you did. You updated a large number of articles with the same text and source promoting your point of view re: public access.

The following and more articles were updated by you with the same copied text:

and more

"The current consensus on Wikipedia is that templates, categories and other forms of anonymous solicitation are inappropriate. Every article on Wikipedia can be expanded as a matter of course..." not how you did with this type of "spamming"

You wrote "Duties
See also: Public domain
See also: Right to science and culture
Is duty of Ministry of Culture of the (name of country) digitize, preserve and make them available and accessible public domain works for every citizen. (name of country) has millions of public domain works (books, pictures, music and films) that belongs to the public domain and since there is not restrictions or copyright on them and all these works can be accessed, copied and enjoyed by its citizen in order to accomplish human right of access to science and culture make more egalitarian access to culture in every country no matter the social status of the cirizens.[inaccessible link][link unrelated to that country's ministry of culture]"
Level C (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the updates are "really bad English". As mentioned on your Talk page #37 Please Slow Down, on October 16, you should stick to updating pages in your native language.Level C (talk) 17:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain archives and Culture Ministers[edit]

Definition: A culture minister is a Cabinet position responsible for protecting the national heritage of a country and promoting cultural expression.

There for my contributions to every article about culture ministers were correct.

Is common sense to know that public domain creations in every country belongs to the population since they do not have copyright, and that is a duty of culture ministers to preserver in order to avoid the lost of this heritage, is not just a duty is their job since they are paid with taxis paid by every citizen and country companies, in other words, this is the primary duty of a cultural ministry, they are not money machine, they are cultural expression facilitators

Finally, if you see a grammar mistake on Wikipedia, you fix it.--P2prules (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I were to try to fix your grammar across Wikipedia, I wouldn't have time to eat, or sleep so then I'd be forced to ask a crew of others to help with this monumental task. Why don't you just stick to editing in your native tongue? You don't know English sufficiently well to do this, sweetie. Maybe one day you will, but right now, you don't. Happy New Year. Level C (talk) 02:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Basic income in the United States[edit]

The article Basic income in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hi, the information in this fairly new article is already found in three others: Basic income,

Income inequality in the United States, and Alaska Permanent Fund.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Level C (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 07:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have failed to acknowledge any of the many, many warnings added to your talk page, and have just continued your editing patterns regardless. This is the definition of disruptive editing. Graham87 07:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of articles[edit]

How come you delete the articles

without notification and without request of speed deletion.

You pretend to improve wikipedia ignoring all rules, but what is the improvement that you see when you delete articles such:

Because they are worse than nothing, especially with your original research; deleting them is improving Wikipedia. I have a question for you: how come you see to know so much about Wikipedia's deletion processes, plus you are able to tell which articles I have deleted, but you don't seem to know about basic things such as navboxes or guidelines like the see also guideline? Have you previousoly edited Wikipedia with another account? Graham87 14:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user may have had problems in the Spanish wikipedia. Her first entry in Spanish under username "P2prules" on August 27, 2009 user wrote in summary "No borren nuevamente el contenido!!!" which translates to "Stop reverting my edits!!!". "...and that's all I have to say about that." (~Forest Gump~). Wikiarcheological work. Level C (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Level C: Oh ... dear! where were their edits being reverted? ... Enquiring minds want to know. Not in the Peer-to-peer article, it seems. Graham87 09:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And of course, the obvious conflict of interest in their updates to Creative Commons and copyright topics because that's what "they do". This user wrote in many Spanish wiki article summaries. "Compartimos obras bajo Creative Commons, Dominio Público y Copyleft - No borren nuevamente el contenido!!! Mejor agregen datos como gpl y otras similares" which translates to "We share works under Creative Commons, Public Domain and Creative Commons and Copyleft - Stop reverting my edits!!! Better to just add details..." @P2prules: You are interested in articles related to law but haven't bothered to learn the rules. Isn't it ironic? Tan interesada en ley pero no has hecho el esfuerzo de aprender las reglas (de Wikipedia) rules=reglas, irónico, no? Level C (talk) 12:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Howard[edit]

Template:Howard has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]