User talk:P.Makaberr

April 2016[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pimp (disambiguation)— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pimp (disambiguation) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism or disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages or place disruptive or unhelpful edits on them, as you did to User talk:Donner60, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 02:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

P.Makaberr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account did not vandalise on the last edit, it was merely a constructive correction. P.Makaberr (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that you know what a constructive correction is, why did you waste our time with all the rest of your vandalism? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

P.Makaberr, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi P.Makaberr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dude (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dude (disambiguation) was changed by P.Makaberr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.989825 on 2016-04-29T16:33:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]