User talk:P.B. Pilhet/Archive-Dec2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RfAs[edit]

Last 20 promotions - one oppose:

  1. Daveydweeb Support
  2. Gogo Dodo No vote
  3. Sandstein Support
  4. HighinBC Support
  5. Renesis Oppose
  6. Nae'blis Support
  7. Viridae No vote (overlooked, should have supported)
  8. Gnangarra No vote
  9. Doug Bell No vote
  10. Metros Support
  11. Tango No vote
  12. Mike Selinker No vote
  13. ReyBrujo No vote
  14. Martinp No vote
  15. Tariq Support Co-nom
  16. Rama Support
  17. Opabinia No vote
  18. Dalbury No vote
  19. Femto Support
  20. Cholmes Support

Frankly, I have no idea what you're talking about. - crz crztalk 04:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"last twenty promoted RfA's". Chrislk is doing quite poorly. I only meant to say that I infrequently oppose someone the community supports. - crz crztalk 23:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfAs[edit]

Last 20 promotions - one oppose:

  1. Daveydweeb Support
  2. Gogo Dodo No vote
  3. Sandstein Support
  4. HighinBC Support
  5. Renesis Oppose
  6. Nae'blis Support
  7. Viridae No vote (overlooked, should have supported)
  8. Gnangarra No vote
  9. Doug Bell No vote
  10. Metros Support
  11. Tango No vote
  12. Mike Selinker No vote
  13. ReyBrujo No vote
  14. Martinp No vote
  15. Tariq Support Co-nom
  16. Rama Support
  17. Opabinia No vote
  18. Dalbury No vote
  19. Femto Support
  20. Cholmes Support

Frankly, I have no idea what you're talking about. - crz crztalk 04:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"last twenty promoted RfA's". Chrislk is doing quite poorly. I only meant to say that I infrequently oppose someone the community supports. - crz crztalk 23:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review[edit]

You're quite welcome, and that is a standing offer. However, I suggest you really study the nomination process and the qualifications of those who have become Admins with near 100% positive votes. A few shortcomings can undo an entire campaign. Sharkface217 20:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar. It honestly was unexpected. Sharkface217 00:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios[edit]

Thanks for pointing that out. I forgot to add the "url=" at the beginning of the url given.. oops. Perel 01:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I am in the process of expanding the article, but I didn't have enough copy to increase the size right away (as this is a colaboration between myself and other Music Directors of the College Radio Station KWLC 1240 AM Decorah. While we appreciate your thoughts, we feel that his contributions to the station and the music we provide to be invaluable, and are attempting to give him some of the recognition he deserves.Demigod14 03:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Deleting of Atal Khanal[edit]

I can understand that Atal khanal is not a notable person. However, it is not that it is illegal that i cant write about atal khanal because i am atal khanal. i want to have an information about myself in wikipedia. i request you to put my article back please

your sincerely Wikipedia member Ottokhanal —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ottokhanal (talk • contribs) 19:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

WikiLove[edit]

Thanks for your comment on the RfD page. However, I am puzzled as to your response, especially after reading how you say, "I condemn personal attacks, incivility, and racism." Please revisit the page and review my comments. You may want to reconsider after understanding a little more about what is happening. Thanks. --Matses 21:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for sharing your comments. Please understand I was referring to Descendall not you. Did you have a chance to revisit the page and see the analysis using the "Professor Test?" I think you will agree I shows notability according to WP Guidelines. Thanks. --Matses 22:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Syncretic reality[edit]

Appears to be Total Bollocks. Question is: is it notable bollocks? Looks like the author is in fact the creator of this, uh, whatever it is. Fan-1967 22:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P. S. Your Cat Is Dead![edit]

I'm very sensitive to the need for spoiler alerts when crucial plot elements or endings are disclosed, and even more careful about keeping my plot summaries general enough that these alerts aren't required. In my description of this play, I revealed nothing of importance, so I believe your addition of the spoiler was unnecessary. Thanks! SFTVLGUY2 22:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E.M.E.R.[edit]

Its a vanity piece. "Hey guys, here's this cute phrase I made up." Username matched the creator of the phrase. Besides, neologism isn't a speedy criterion, so I grabbed one which is a valid CSD that could fit. Fan-1967 22:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greg McGuire makes it even clearer, if you check it quickly before it's speedied. Fan-1967 23:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paternity Party[edit]

Hi, I tried to update the entry to avoid deletion. Is there any more information you need? Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Agrossman (talk • contribs) 23:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Re: THE PRINCIPLES OF ZEROMETRICS

Hi Justin:

Just want to let you know that I had obtained permission from the author to reprint the article verbatim in Wikipedia. At the present time, the article has been updated in the Talk page, and the Talk version is the most current version.

Let me know if you have any additional concerns with the above article.

Pat

Paternity Party[edit]

Cool, thanks. I'm new to this site! (obviously)

How long until the posting is up?

Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Agrossman (talk • contribs) 04:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for voting[edit]

File:In-the-dark.jpg

Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, User:Essjay|Essjay]] remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help![edit]

Hey,

You commented on my blanking a page, sorry about that, didn't mean too! How do you revert a page back to a previous edit if it has been vandalized or something similar. THanks

Kendall Gregory 22:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Give this guy a boot?[edit]

91.127.167.204

Came onto the Zone page and keeps adding back his advertisement. He even left a note on my talk page.

Thanks. TFX 23:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the guy's still harassing.

I don't think he understands what the point of Wikipedia, and that is to not advertise his daft wares.

TFX 07:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found my way here via the {{helpme}}; I've gone ahead and warned that user with {{npa}}. Will try to keep an eye on it, past that. Luna Santin 08:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concordia Newsletter[edit]

NEWSLETTER

Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.

Help out now![edit]

  • Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
  • Give people the Civility Barnstar.
  • Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
  • Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
  • Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.

We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.

Decision Making[edit]

The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.

If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.

- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot. [reply]

Smile[edit]

§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Keep up your good work here! You are great. Merry christmas and god bless you and everyone you know.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 02:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:P.B._Pilhet/Archive-Dec2006&oldid=745733457"