User talk:Orujah123

I am citing UC Berkeley affiliated academics.

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Jeremy Bamidele[edit]

I would like to begin writing an article on Billy Curtis a UC Berkeley faculty member. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Jeremy Bamidele, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Appears to be an accidental page created in Wikipedia space

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CaroleHenson (talk) 02:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I seem to be several steps behind you today... and see you left a note and then deleted the entries on your talk page. I am happy to help you work on an article - and help identify someone to write about. Is it something you need to do tonight?--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you wanting to work on an article on Billy Curtis?

Name: BILLY CURTIS
Home Department: BNGEQ - Gender Equity Resource Ctr
Address Information
Default Primary Work Address

Title: Executive Director: Multicultural, Sexuality, And Gender Centers
Department Name: Vice Chancellor-Equity & Inclusion Office

--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I skipped him.  I'm currently on Steven Fish.  There was a name conflict with Billy Curtis.Orujah123 (talk) 05:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Bamidele[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeremy Bamidele requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CaroleHenson (talk) 03:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Jeremy Bamidele.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremy Bamidele.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:45, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest again[edit]

What happened to your statement yesterday that "Furthermore, I will no longer make edits concerning Jeremy Bamidele."? You have since created an article about Bamidele in mainspace, made 70 edits to it and to the discussion of it, and uploaded a passport photo of Bamidele as your "own work".

If you are Jeremy Bamidele you should not be making these edits and are advised to "provide full disclosure of the connection if you comment about the article on talk pages or in other discussions", per WP:COISELF. --McGeddon (talk) 08:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CaroleHenson was extremely nice to you, because she's a nice person. However, there are limits to how nice we all can be. Our COI guidelines are clear that you cannot create an article about yourself, but rather must submit it for review. Moving it it to article space was disruptive of you. Further, you then proceeded to essentially attack Carole for following our policies. Having looked over what you had in the draft, it's fairly clear that if the subject was actually notable you wouldn't have trouble proving it, but if that's impossible then the bio does not belong in Wikipedia. I hope you have the common sense to stop at this point, and come back to write this when and if the subject actually meets WP:BIO. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation (returned from talk history)[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orujah123, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sjö (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Thank you so much. I'll refrain from editing until I get a mentor. I've messaged a potential adoptee. Hopefully they take me.

I added the following to the Sockpuppet investigation for this account:

"Comment - another user account" - It appears that the user, who has been trying to get the Jeremy Bamidele article created has created the article under a new user name User:EZRASExy. This was discussed at this discussion, this discussion, and the two most recent entries here. The Jeremy Bamidele article was deleted today and the most recent edited version was restored in Draft:Jeremy Bamidele today - meaning that it had to have been copied by someone who copied it before deletion.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of deletion discussion[edit]

Notice of deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jeremy Bamidele,--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for using multiple accounts to recreate rejected AFC drafts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Steven Fish concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Steven Fish, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]