User talk:Orphic

Welcome!

Hello, Orphic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Unimaginative Username (talk) 04:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation case[edit]

That would be great, thanks! I'll let you know when you can be of help (I'm about to notify other users involved in the dispute on their respective talk pages). CloudNine (talk) 16:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. I would have access to JSTOR normally, but I'm back home for Christmas now. You could summarise the evidence on the medcab page (or is it too early in the case to add evidence?) or my talk page? Do what you think it is best. Thanks again for your help. CloudNine (talk) 09:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I think the main issue now is clarifying WP:NPOV with respect to undue weight. Have a happy Christmas. CloudNine (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Chris 10:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR paper[edit]

I'm wondering if I can ask you a favour. I'm currently contributing to List of Presidents of the American Bar Association, and I was wondering if you could perhaps check a paper on JSTOR? (My university, a technical college, hasn't bought access to any legal journals). This is the paper I'd like to look at. I'm specifically looking for the names of some of the early Presidents (a quick scan through is all that's needed). I'll provide you with a list of you feel like doing it, if not, that's fine. CloudNine (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great to me. Thanks! CloudNine (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Orphic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]