User talk:Onyxig
Warning[edit]
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
November 2009[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 17:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Onyxig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear admin, please take a careful look at this page. I have not committed any vandalism, I have even asked for admins help in scrubbing this article, since it contains ridiculous amount of un-sourced, and even worse fake-sourced, un.org??? material. If you carefully look at the page you will see that it describes one of the biggest terrorist groups on the planet as 'humanitarians, who came to help Bosniaks, agianst Serb and Croat aggression', which is ridiculous. Once again a very biased, half-ass if at all sourced article that makes Wiki shine...I am becoming very irritated, that every time i contribute something related to all this non-sense, I get warned and blocked, yet no one bothers even reading what the edits were and how objective the article is. Thank you.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for edit warring, which is making the same edit over and over without attempting to discuss the issue. Furthermore, your unblock request does not address your behavior, but rather the behavior of other editors. Please explain how you will change your behavior in order to avoid future problems. TNXMan 20:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Onyxig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not sure what is unclear, I was protecting my own edits, just like user PRODUCER was undoing my work, which was not vandalism. So what is there regarding my behavior that I need to discuss. Why has he not been blocked as well, for exact same thing? Exactly.... You ask me to explain my behavior instead of other partie's and yet that's what caused all this non-sense. Can you or someone logical/adequate scrub that article for valid sources?
Decline reason:
Drop the accusations. Declined. -Jeremy (v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!) 23:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Heheh this is priceless! Long lived objective wikipedia and all of its balkan articles! Congrats admins, I don't know which one of you does a better job, you should all be awarded for your correctness, and above all fairness...Onyxig (talk) 01:51, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Balkan Sanction imposed[edit]
You are now subject to a sanction restricting you to 1RR per week on all Balkan-related articles. This sanction has been recorded in your block log and in the list of blocks and sanctions related to the Balkans. Violations of this sanction can lead to long-term blocks. Toddst1 (talk) 23:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! You did a good deed today! Pat yourself on the shoulder :) Onyxig (talk) 01:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)