User talk:OnlyFanK
May 2024[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jeolla Province have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jeolla Province was changed by OnlyFanK (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916164 on 2024-05-14T06:03:50+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
YOu need to read WP:ONUS and WP:editwar. Slatersteven (talk) 10:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It seems like a subjective judgment, but where exactly is the problem? OnlyFanK (talk) 10:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- No they are policies, and the place to get wp:consensus for your edit is the article talk page. If you mean my reversion, yes it is a value judgment, based on those policies, you have to convince us we are wrong. Slatersteven (talk) 10:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
You may also need to read wp:not. Slatersteven (talk) 11:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Other articles on this wiki already use similar quality sources. Like the Battle of Paro Lake OnlyFanK (talk) 11:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is not a good example, that stub is next to useless, and if it is not improved may well get AFD'd. Amd "similar" does not mean "the same".Slatersteven (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The examples I gave are from the exact same source. OnlyFanK (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr is only used once in your edit, and as I said, that article you mention may not pass our policies. Slatersteven (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't they just delete it because they didn't like the content for no particular reason? There are already other people on the wiki doing the same thing as me. OnlyFanK (talk) 12:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The article has not been deleted Battle of Paro Lake, yet. Slatersteven (talk) 12:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't they just delete it because they didn't like the content for no particular reason? There are already other people on the wiki doing the same thing as me. OnlyFanK (talk) 12:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr is only used once in your edit, and as I said, that article you mention may not pass our policies. Slatersteven (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The examples I gave are from the exact same source. OnlyFanK (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is not a good example, that stub is next to useless, and if it is not improved may well get AFD'd. Amd "similar" does not mean "the same".Slatersteven (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)