User talk:Ohyos

Jane Addams: Don't edit war[edit]

Rapid reversions do not assist article clarity and get enough of them and you may be blocked for edit warring.

Five sources have been used to confirm that Jane Addams was in two romantic friendships in her life. You may not be comfortable with the term "lesbian" to define her, but the term did not exist as we know it during her life to describe the relationships she was in. Discuss on the talk page. Don't rapid revert. --Moni3 (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Dixon[edit]

Because it was a bad article name, non-descriptive of who he was or his importance. Trust that older editors know what we're doing. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jane Addams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 03:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jane Addams, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 16:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]