User talk:Obornp

A welcome from Master of Puppets

Hello, Obornp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :) _-M ^o P-_ 21:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

No problem! But you showed good initiative and signed up at the New User's Log. You also seem very enthusiastic. Anyway, if you ever have any questions at all (heck, they don't have to be related to Wikipedia :P), just zip down to my talk page and fire away. _-M ^o P-_ 21:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

P.S. I was wondering, what kind of stuff did you think you'd be doing on Wikipedia? As a reference point so I know how to help.

Level 3 Communications

Hi, I reverted your edit to the Level 3 Communications page. WP:MoS#Bulleted and numbered lists doesn't like lists if they can be avoided, and I don't know if the additions were really that relevant. Let me know if you disagree! Thanks, 17:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't mind that you replaced it, but can you word it sans jargon? I have no idea what an "indirect channel partner" may be. A client, perhap? Fleetham (talk) 04:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I replaced 'channel partner' with 'sales agency' per your request. - Obornp (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you, but could you make more substantial changes? I still don't really understand what an "indirect sales agency" is, or why listing the top ten is important. I think we should remove the list and replace it with a description of how Level 3 Communications sells its products. That will be more durable and better inform the reader than a list of companies that may become outdated. Fleetham (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

No worries. An indirect sales agency is an official sales company that is contracted with Level 3 (or any carrier) to sell their products to businesses. The main difference between employees (inside or 'direct' sales) and outside agencies (indirect sales) is that the outside sales reps don't earn any salary or benefits. We work 100% for residual commission. Typically, carriers move about 50% of their products through their own employees (direct sales) and 50% through the indirect "channel", or group of outside sales companies. Both receive product training from the carrier, as well as internal sales engineering support resources. I'm thinking a page for "Indirect Sales Channel" may be warranted. You're not the first person who has asked about this. The Cisco indirect sales channel, for example, accounts for over 90% of the company's sales revenue. It's akin to outsourcing your sales department - because if the outside sales reps don't actually sell anything, the companies don't have to pay.

With regards to the Level 3 page, I can do additional research and probe my contacts within Level 3 to learn more about their specific sales channels. As I am the most well versed on the indirect channel, as evidenced by my contribution, I'll need a little time to investigate the others. (ie: gov't, wholesale, etc.) -- Obornp (talk) 15:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Correction - I did find the appropriate indirect sales link. But it could use a LOT of work. That will be my

next project. -- Obornp (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. And I wouldn't recommend doing original research, as WP:No original research is one of the main tenets of Wikipedia. 18:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. Once I found out what structure is in place at Level 3, I'll do my best to find already-published works to support the findings. -- Obornp (talk) 12:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Airespring do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:33, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)