User talk:Nmramemphis

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Bell Helicopter Textron. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. - BillCJ 02:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox! Propaganda or advocacy of any kind. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view. You might wish to go to Usenet or start a blog if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. Please refrain from violating this policy, as you have done on Bell Helicopter Textron. - BillCJ 02:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must say that although facts are facts people should consult the Wikipedia article on Karma (bad/good). Textron's stock wows and executive Michael Redenbaugh's resignation because of cost overuns with Bell's H-1 program for the navy are bad news for this company. Although this does not implicate the Mirabel Operation, I do believe that bad luck can be linked to bad karma (i.e. bad policies). - Nmramemphis

See http://www.projo.com/news/content/BZ_TEXTRON_SLUMP20_01-20-07_8L414EO.d5d8b6.html