User talk:NevermindtheBlondeonBlonde

Re: What the hell.[edit]

Re: your message: You are clearly a vandal and there is no requirement to be nice to vandals. If you do not stop your vandalizing, I will block you from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: These edits that you made [1][2][3][4] were all clearly vandalism. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Michelle Remembers. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you seriously want to request an unblock, use the {{unblock}} template once. Abuse of the unblock template will not be tolerated and may lead to your talk page access being revoked. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NevermindtheBlondeonBlonde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What happened to my unblock requests? Geez, you guys are really being jerks. No good faith from you guys. NevermindtheBlondeonBlonde (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests with personal attacks are automatically denied. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NevermindtheBlondeonBlonde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where is the rule that states one cannot put forth more than on unblock request?NevermindtheBlondeonBlonde (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's a simple common sense rule: don't waste the time of the Wikipedia volunteers who you're requesting unblock from. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NevermindtheBlondeonBlonde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have apologized, and put forth many, many, many, unblock requests stating why I did what I did, and the like. I believe I have shown that I have learned my lesson, though I still believe I was unfairly blocked. Also, just by perusing my edits, one can see that they were made in good faith, and were not intentional "vandalism". I can also explain each of my edits, if need be, even the ones that were assumed vandalism.

Decline reason:

Somehow I doubt that. I'll go ahead and revoke your talk page access to save everyone the time of any future unblock requests. Kinu ^t/_c 07:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.